Divide and conquer eh Ben
Wouldn’t say that, although d&c is a successful recent tactic used by many with far more power than me.
It was a suggestion. An alternative view of freedoms.
Whilst maintaining the freedom to choose whether or not to be vaccinated it also considers the freedoms of those that have done the right thing & had the vaccination.
Like freedom of speech, you can say what you like but there may also be consequences after you say it.
Why should people who choose not to be vaccinated negatively impact the lives of those that choose to be vaccinated?
People are free to choose but should be aware that there may be consequences that come with their choice.
As many know I’ve recently had a long stay in hospital. The consequence of other people’s choices (not getting vaccinated) affected the length of stay, the visitor (or lack of visitors) I could see, my family, my & other members of my family’s mental health, my physical health & many other things.
People are again having treatment put on hold as a direct consequence of people not getting vaccinated.
People who refuse to be vaccinated are negatively affecting the lives of millions of people everyday. I can’t think of a single negative affect having my vaccination has had on me or one other person, let alone millions of people.
The sooner people are vaccinated & accept that sporadic boosters (like other vaccinations) may well be necessary the sooner we’ll return to some kind of normality.
The reason we are where we are now is because of people not getting vaccinated. Why should those who do bear the brunt of it?