Theres a gaping hole in his comment anyway mate ignore it.Stop already ffs![]()
Nope, very specific figure and wording mate, died within 28 days of recording a positive test.I don't understand, if you produce a test to say you haven't got it then how can you be recorded as dying from it, similarly if you have it and you die after 28days of the confirmation that you had it, say 30 or 40 days later, are you not recorded as one of the death from covid-19?
Im part of the ons covid survey btw.
Have been for more than a year, come by the gaff and take my blood for 25 quid a pop.
I should charge more tbh
Then couldn't there be a whole lot of people who die due to the effects of covid-19 after say 40 days who aren't being counted in the stats?Nope, very specific figure and wording mate, died within 28 days of recording a positive test.
35-45 surely….You’re representing the entire 24-48 age group.
35-45 surely….
More like 24/34 age group but yh you make a good pointYou’re representing the entire 24-48 age group.
Nobody is lying on the certificates which is why the word "with" is used instead of from, the 28 days is purely to bring us in line with others according to you so we look better.The bit where you called it bullshit and denied the accuracy of the figures, without grasping how it actually works. For the ONS figures to be wrong someone is lying on a death cert.
Where did you read that mate?
Why are deaths being classed "with Covid" and not "from Covid" and what significance does recording a positive test within 28 days hold.
Bullshit.Nobody is lying on the certificates which is why the word "with" is used instead of from, the 28 days is purely to bring us in line with others according to you so we look better.
It would be so much easier and more accurate to record deaths "from" Covid and it's related complications.
There could well be if it triggered or made worse a pre-existing conditionThen couldn't there be a whole lot of people who die due to the effects of covid-19 after say 40 days who aren't being counted in the stats?

Theres a gaping hole in his comment anyway mate ignore it.
Which bit, the bit i quote from Tobes or the bit where i said the actual cause of death should be recorded?Bullshit.
You ever seen a death certificate?Nobody is lying on the certificates which is why the word "with" is used instead of from, the 28 days is purely to bring us in line with others according to you so we look better.
It would be so much easier and more accurate to record deaths "from" Covid and it's related complications.
You must log in or register to see images

Cmon bro enough of the threats yehYou ever seen a death certificate?
That's actually a good read, have saved itFigures earlier this year showed a comparison in death statistics.
Those totalled the last 5 years to get a more accurate average and the excess deaths (the amount above was slightly higher) . Can't remember where I read it so obviously my memory could be wrong.
As for your questions:
Maybe this'll help
https://ukhsa.blog.gov.uk/2020/08/12/behind-the-headlines-counting-covid-19-deaths/
