I think it might be down to Post 45Very bad day at the office. We regroup and go again, we know our capabilities.
I also blame the "curse of Kiwi" for posting those pictures.
I think it might be down to Post 45Very bad day at the office. We regroup and go again, we know our capabilities.
I also blame the "curse of Kiwi" for posting those pictures.
So do most people in Stoke.
I think what yesterday showed is how much we missed Wallace and Adomah, they would have given Willock and Chair more scope to get at the Stoke backline by giving us additional threat. Puzzled that Johansen kept popping up so much on the right when he's so left-footed. Stoke are a hard watch but O'Neil has them very well organised at spoiling. They won't win many friends but will be in the mix come May.
I think I saw a tweet yesterday saying 42 shots on goal in our 2 home defeats this season, just unfortunate yesterday their keeper played out of his skin. The potential loss of Chair and Dieng is a real worry...
Aunts and Uncles but if the pen had gone in, we'd have won.
how many of the 12000 R's fans wanted Chas to take it? Not me.
Willock or Johansen i would have thought.
Aunts and Uncles but if the pen had gone in, we'd have won.
how many of the 12000 R's fans wanted Chas to take it? Not me.
Willock or Johansen i would have thought.
Aunts and Uncles but if the pen had gone in, we'd have won.
how many of the 12000 R's fans wanted Chas to take it? Not me.
Willock or Johansen i would have thought.
Me three.Me neither.
Well Windsor, your confidence was unfounded. I take it you never went to the Sunderland match? In the same way i didn't want Barbet or Chair near it, why would anyone want Austin to take it. Don't get you, sorry.
Windsor. In theory, I get your logic. But, at the time, i thought, please let's not let Austin take it and then i saw the ball in his hands and thought *&^%$ no.
I don't even want to say ITYS as it was such an important miss.
As per the fans forum last week Warburton is well aware of the risks in playing two wing backs at this level and the pressure that puts on the back three when teams attack on the break. Sadly this is particularly true when your key centre back lacks pace and I have lost count of the number of chances we have coughed up where Dickie (the best I have seen at QPR for years in all other departments BTW) gets isolated one-on-one. I think we are stuck with this trade-off for the foreseeable future so we'd better hope that the excellent attacking play we have seen so much of outweighs the risks at the back. There are worse things in football.
Another reason why we miss Eze. Loved his pens, not just that he scored but how he did it. Worth rewatching which most aren't.I mean there’s just not a really obvious candidate. Austin is generally immobile outside the box but for a pressure situation of just striking the ball he tends to be reliable. ****ed it yesterday of course.
Willock/Chair/Johansen/Dozzell/Barbet in theory might strike the ball cleanly (Sunderland excepted) but you want your experienced striker taking penalties unless they’ve decided in training someone else will. We had Bidwell taking them not long ago.
I mean there’s just not a really obvious candidate. Austin is generally immobile outside the box but for a pressure situation of just striking the ball he tends to be reliable. ****ed it yesterday of course.
Willock/Chair/Johansen/Dozzell/Barbet in theory might strike the ball cleanly (Sunderland excepted) but you want your experienced striker taking penalties unless they’ve decided in training someone else will. We had Bidwell taking them not long ago.
Im never posting againVery bad day at the office. We regroup and go again, we know our capabilities.
I also blame the "curse of Kiwi" for posting those pictures.