Off Topic The Politics Thread
- Thread starter Stroller
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
First, it's not a trans person having a ****. It's a trans person having a **** in public. Clearly, woke doesn't see the difference when a dress is involved.
It's boring having to repeat myself - the relevance of posting this, is not to draw attention to some pervert getting his penis out - but the way it was reported in part of the press. That this was a criminal offence by a woman. That does not sit well with me.
And do not virtue signal over the 12 year old girl that was murdered today. Just because I didn't mention it during a post on a sexual pervert, does not mean I'm not completely shocked and saddened by it. Nor does the fact that I haven't mentioned male on female violence recently. It's highly concerning, but it has been going on since the caveman - so although it's on the increase, it's not new. The encroachment of trans on women's rights is new. Excluding the honourable exceptions of those trans people having had surgery, men who simply say they identify as a woman are forcing their way into women's areas. Feminists have fought hard for their rights since the 1960's and now men are taking them back. Women and girls should be safe and confident in female toilets, changing areas etc Males with genitals in a woman's changing room present an apparent risk, even if in fact the risk is benign.
Last edited:
You brought Eller's wife into a pejorative example you were giving, Will. Cut out the personal stuff.
Enjoyed our afternoon at the bingo, Gladys. Hope the hot flushes have passed and your dryness is well moisturised
Was this the “you could walk in on Johnson shagging your wife and would ask him if he’d like a cup of tea” or similar?
Fair enough. You could walk in on Boris Johnson and John Major shagging your wife and would ask if they fancied a cup of tea. Probably not Major so much now he’s left of UKIP.
Major is now left of Blair. Starmer should invite him into his shadow cabinet to plan a "Rejoin the EU" strategy - though female Labour MP's may not be safe with Long John around... well, Margaret Beckett might be.
I find this a little irrelevant tbh.
There is no law against anyone dressing in a dress and saying they are a woman (or a laaaady). But it is against the law to expose your genitals in public (p**** or the equivalent). This person is obviously an exhibitionist, trying to make a point or something. This is a criminal mental health problem and little to do with the trans discussion
No trans person would do that for effect. No transperson would go through all that it entails to become or be seen as a woman to rape a woman, there are a lot easier ways to do that.
Why is everyone so fixated in what is in your trousers/under your skirt. That is the bit I really really don't understand.
Cannot we all just accept each other for who we are ...it is not hard
Oh and also lets keep it civil, ...
Its called simply RESPECT
As I said to Will, Beth, the relevance for me is the fact that this is being reported as a women's crime. It may go down into crime statistics for women. Are you happy with that?
To be honest Goldie yes.
A woman charged with indecent exposure of their p@@@@, will be seen for what it is.
It will be dealt with appropriately, if this person is in the process of transitioning they will be treated as the gender they identify as...if not they will be treated as the gender they are. I think we have to leave that up to the individual case. I suspect they be assigned to the local mental/social services as the behaviour is decidedly odd....man, woman or trans
But self identifying trans people (with no surgery done or planned) may go with the gender they choose and no allowance will be made in crime statistics. So all crimes done by men in dresses will be down to women. It will skew reality.
Agree about the mental services!
Ffs goldy, give over. I remember it now! There was nothing in that at all. No need to go all gammony on it
Think youve got your knickers in a twist over this mate
I only wear knickers when I'm out with Uber
And there lays the difference mate. I wouldnt have been bothered and would have seen it for the metaphor it was, just as i believe you did but needed to go gammon on something. I mentioned Steels mrs in a post and he took it for what it was.
What did you say about Steel's Mrs? Will used it in a pejorative anecdote, which is not on.
Oh get a grip for ****s sake. You know and everyone knows what Wills meant. Quite a good one i thought to be fair