Twitter has any number similar to this. Like, hundreds 
You must log in or register to see media
Twitter has any number similar to this. Like, hundreds
You must log in or register to see media
I'm fairly sure none of those 'armchair' coaches legislated for this :-And yet only a few months ago nearly all those arm chair coaches, who think they have all the answers now, were saying how well we'd done in the transfer window and how we were going to give the PL a proper go this time
I'm fairly sure none of those 'armchair' coaches legislated for this :-
You must log in or register to see media
I was one of those who thought we got it right in the transfer window but now I'm wondering whether we spread our money over too many players. So far, Normann is the only new player who looks comfortable in the PL. The others are all good players, but unfortunately not good enough to make a difference in the PL. Watford have Sarr, Leeds have Raphinha, but we don't have that one attacking player who can make a difference at this level. Some will say that we lost that in Buendia, but I'm not so sure. He tore up the Championship, but the level of the PL rises year by year and you need pace as well as world class skills to make an impact now.Maybe not, but those same 'armchair' coaches would soon be on Hanley's and the team's back if we tried to play it out and someone made a mistake. Not that I'm suggesting going long is the answer, although to a certain extent Farke got the tactics right in going long down the channels against Leeds back 3, thereby forcing the mids wide and leaving Phillips more isolated, than he would like in the middle. Even Farke's decision to play Omobamidele looked nowhere near as strange at the end of the game, as it did at the start.
I think part of the problem is Farke is haunted by our last time in the PL and has gone against his natural instincts by trying to play too defensively. I might have said this before !, but I'd much rather have stuck with a 4-2-3-1 and play more offensively, at least that way even if we lose there's something to cheer.
To some extent, although we lost yesterday, there were points in the game when things could have gone our way. Poor defending and Krul's unusual mistake in conceding so easily after we got straight back into the game and had the momentum was not Farke's fault. For all that was poor with yesterday's performance, at least we were in the game until the end.
Whilst Farke does in my view occasionally get the tactics wrong, most of our problems come from individual errors and this, for me, is as much about the quality of players we can afford, rather than Farke's management skills. As soon as we go down to the Championship those same players shine. The difference is the pace of the game and at the moment very few of our players can cope with PL pace. Which is why in my view sacking Farke will not improve things, whilst risking any chance we have of bouncing back, should we go down.
As long as Farke doesn't lose the dressing room then I see no advantage in sacking him. Who would we replace him with who stood as much chance as him of getting us out of the championship, if we go down
Is he the only manager out there that can get us out of the Champ? I'm sure there's others. I'm also not sure why people think with the remnants of the remaining team we'd be anywhere near certain for another straight return.
Also, why on earth would we wait to find out another season of less income, lower quality players, less chance of survival next time in the EPL, surely we act now, to even give us a remote chance of staying up, given there's no signs of us doing with the current setup.
Jurgen KlinsmannUnless I'm mistaken Farke has a 100% success rate of getting a team out of the Championship. Who pray tell me has a better record ?
If someone has a better or even identical impressive record, Are they available ? Would they come to Norwich ?
Who said we were certain to get out of the Championship if we go back down, certainly not me, but it is not unreasonable, if we do go down to want to have a head coach who has never failed to get a team promoted out of the Championship.
Your second paragraph makes no sense under Farke / Webber the club has constantly improved and is a million miles away from the basket case they inherited. If your ONLY measure of being a well run successful club is that we must be an established PL club at all costs, then yes they've failed, but by any other measure they've significantly improve the club. Who says if we are in the Championship next season we will have less money, lower quality players and if we get promoted again less chance of survival in the PL. I know some fans think being in the PL is the be-all & end-all of football, but and this might come as a surprise to you, not all fans think like that.
Funny, I keep asking the same question 'who would we replace Farke with ? ' and no one on here has come up with a single realistic suggestion.
Jurgen Klinsmann
OK Joachim LöwAre you saying he's a realistic potential replacement ? Is so, what is this based on ?
Funny, I keep asking the same question 'who would we replace Farke with ? ' and no one on here has come up with a single realistic suggestion.

Well I guess the obvious available options are along the lines of:
Bruce, Wilder, Howe, Lennon, Monk, McCarthy, Hughton
, Robins
, Rusty
or some unknown from the lower leagues of France*/Germany*/Spain*/Portugal* etc (*delete flavour of the month as applicable), whether we could entice one of those is a different question
How many more games without a win is acceptable?Yeah we can all list managers not currently managing or anyone managing who has a Norwich connection. But I asked for ' a single realistic' suggestion.
So which one of those do you think
a) Would want to manage us.
b) We could afford.
c) Wouldn't be out of their depth in the PL
d) Would have a better chance than Farke of keeping us in the PL with our current squad.
e) Would be willing to stay with us should we get relegated.
f) Has a better chance than Farke of getting us out of the Championship should we get relegated.
g) Wouldn't disappear and leave us in the lurch as soon as a better offer came along.
I personally don't think we should sack him, but if we are going to, maybe we should have an idea who we're going to replace him with.
How many more games without a win is acceptable?
A. 3 ?
B. 5 ?
C. 10 ?
D. 20 ?
E. 38 ?
There is nobody out there desperate enough to come to Norwich so we better just suck it up and not moan about the 20 game winless EPL run .
I don't know, but as I said before as long as Farke doesn't lose the dressing room I see little advantage in sacking him at the moment. It wasn't that long ago that the majority of fans were worried that he wouldn't sign a new contract. He could have left us and moved on to other things, he didn't he stayed. So for me a the moment I don't see the logic in sacking him, but I also don't think it's the right thing to do. That might well change at some point in the future, but we're not at that point yet. I know most clubs would just get rid, but part of the reason I support Norwich is I think we're better than that.
Unless there's a manager waiting in the wings to start tomorrow, I think he gets at least the next 4.So another 10 then ?
in which case do you switch to planning for the championship and keep Farke?? It's a really tricky problem.