If you want a knowledge as wide and interesting as Rafmans I suggest you read the wikipedia page of the people in question and simply run a narrative based on that. I could quite easily say that Favre is a top top manager based on the exact same "evidence" Rafman has read compared to the negative he's an overrated crock that he pumps out. This ridicule came out when Rafman felt it boosted his argument to produce a laundry list of anecdotal nonsense about Benitez that he has zero evidence for. He reads this **** on other forums
Gerrard has been interviewed and is interested in the job. Fonseca has agreed to join us, but no official contract has been offered yet, until all candidates have been looked at.
Poch? Allegri hasn’t won the Champions League? Simeone hasn’t won the Champions League? So if it’s purely down to trophies.. if Pep went and managed Brentford now but failed to win a trophy but got them in the Champions League, would he not be good enough for us? Klopp never won a trophy at Mainz. Yet he got hired to a better club because with the resources given to him, he did well with. I hope you don’t manage any Sunday league teams, your lads would get ****ing roasted if they didn’t win the quad every year.
Both Favre & Rafa have overall 49% win rates of there managerial career & thats with Rafa managing Chelsea, Real Madrid, Inter, Liverpool & Napoli. Whilst Favre managed Dortmund, Nice and Monchengladbach. Rafa should have a higher win rate than that with those teams.
He's a nice enough chap I think I'm just bored of rafa and it brought out my c#nt side. The lads welcome to his views.
Ideally, but I don't think it will happen. At this point I'm not too sure who would be best. Do we want a young manager who is going to be developing their own career alongside the club such as a Gerrard. Do we want someone old and wise to steer us clear of relegation. Such as a Pulis, but then won't be able to take us to the next level, so we search again in the summer.