I just noticed on the official site that Curtis Fleming will be in charge at Millwall due to a positive PCR test for Nigel. Get well soon Nigel and good luck to Curtis.
Off Topic Positive PCR for Nigel.
- Thread starter invermeremike
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Bad news. Hope he has the 'mild' symptoms.
Hasn't he had it before? (or am I thinking of Cotts?)
If so then he has had Covid AND is double-jabbed and STILL catches it again. Bad news for EVERYONE FFS.
Hasn't he had it before? (or am I thinking of Cotts?)
If so then he has had Covid AND is double-jabbed and STILL catches it again. Bad news for EVERYONE FFS.
A Public Health England report released Thursday September 23rd shows that 77% of Covid-19 deaths between August 23rd and September 19th 2021 were among the vaccinated population, with 73% of the deaths being among the fully vaccinated, and 4% of the deaths being among the partly vaccinated.
Yet the mainstream media continues to blatantly lie to the public and claim that the majority of Covid-19 deaths are among the unvaccinated. This has to end.
Yet the mainstream media continues to blatantly lie to the public and claim that the majority of Covid-19 deaths are among the unvaccinated. This has to end.
You must log in or register to see images
not had or got time look at this but doesn't seem as straightforward as you seem to analysis it. One point springs to mind by cursory look .. of 100,000 not vaccinated 156 die … 100,000 fully vaccinated only 49 die …. bearing in mind something like 45million have had 2 jabs and 5 million have had none then deaths are a higher percent per capita of the unjabbed ……
will check the figures later ..
ignore under 18 & unlinked the table shows :-
3121 died .. 726 not vaccinated leaving … 2395 who were or in process of …
now peeps above 80 are in real danger of dying anyway [specimen date] and it would figure they are least likely to survive as most have underlying ailmments [ fitness being the main one ]
if we take the middle group:- [ 3 groups below and 3 above ]
50 - 59 we see
243 …… 128 …… 0 …. 13 …. 102 to put into perspective the 243 is from a population of 55,000,000 ……….. the 128 is from a population 6,000,000 …………. 13 + 102 = 115 is from a population of 49,000,00
notes[ deaths .. unvaccinated … had at least 1 jab ] population based on number of first jabs and estimated un jabbed figures
simple figures are unjabbed is 52.68% jabbed is 47 .32% looks pretty close almost a dead [ no pun ] heat but no, way way way off the mark, as % of population[ that's people who are source for specimen date ] the 128 unjabbed is 0.00213% where as the 115 jabbed is 0.000234%
% of published figures [ via population qualifiers ALL AGED GROUPS ] . :-
unjabbed ……………..726 is 0.0121% of 6,000,000.
1 JAB + ===2395 is 0.0048% of 49,000,000.
Don't know where your ……………
77% of Covid-19 deaths between August 23rd and September 19th 2021 were among the vaccinated population, with 73% of the deaths being among the fully vaccinated, and 4% of the deaths being among the partly vaccinated.
Yet the mainstream media continues to blatantly lie to the public and claim that the majority of Covid-19 deaths are among the unvaccinated. This has to end.
but will re visit the 77% when more time just had a quick tea break to run through this post…….
However … THE LAST BIT OF THE TABLE TELLS THE STORY.... per 100,000 I am part of the 49.5 peeps likely to die not the 156 that youse is! [ bit of colour for ROD ]
3121 died .. 726 not vaccinated leaving … 2395 who were or in process of …
now peeps above 80 are in real danger of dying anyway [specimen date] and it would figure they are least likely to survive as most have underlying ailmments [ fitness being the main one ]
if we take the middle group:- [ 3 groups below and 3 above ]
50 - 59 we see
243 …… 128 …… 0 …. 13 …. 102 to put into perspective the 243 is from a population of 55,000,000 ……….. the 128 is from a population 6,000,000 …………. 13 + 102 = 115 is from a population of 49,000,00
notes[ deaths .. unvaccinated … had at least 1 jab ] population based on number of first jabs and estimated un jabbed figures
simple figures are unjabbed is 52.68% jabbed is 47 .32% looks pretty close almost a dead [ no pun ] heat but no, way way way off the mark, as % of population[ that's people who are source for specimen date ] the 128 unjabbed is 0.00213% where as the 115 jabbed is 0.000234%
% of published figures [ via population qualifiers ALL AGED GROUPS ] . :-
unjabbed ……………..726 is 0.0121% of 6,000,000.
1 JAB + ===2395 is 0.0048% of 49,000,000.
Don't know where your ……………
77% of Covid-19 deaths between August 23rd and September 19th 2021 were among the vaccinated population, with 73% of the deaths being among the fully vaccinated, and 4% of the deaths being among the partly vaccinated.
Yet the mainstream media continues to blatantly lie to the public and claim that the majority of Covid-19 deaths are among the unvaccinated. This has to end.
but will re visit the 77% when more time just had a quick tea break to run through this post…….
However … THE LAST BIT OF THE TABLE TELLS THE STORY.... per 100,000 I am part of the 49.5 peeps likely to die not the 156 that youse is! [ bit of colour for ROD ]
actually think this has been covered there is no 77% ! it is 52.68% of the unfortunate death toll were UNJABBED & other 47.32% of those were 1 or more jabbed
Must admit, not sure of the rates table as is showing as they do seem to contradict each other....but it is what's showing on PHE...
https://assets.publishing.service.g...992/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_38.pdf
Although I did get my article from a different site.
https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/28/fact-check-vaccinated-77-percent-covid-deaths-mainsteam-media-lying/
Last edited:
these sort of tables do contradict, often they put all info without explaining it [ not just PHE]
Usually the main string can be isolated … [ determine what simple info is being conveyed ] table shows death's un jabbed / jabbed so 3 columns would work. It is then down to wiping away any confusing bits or adding reality aspect.
PHE could have done it 2 ways [ simple for peeps to understand.better! ]
as above 3 columns based on actual event ...or …
as % of population [ point of table is indicator of death toll ] I did both … the 0.000xx% will with further working out give totals per 100k of all age bands …. they mixed both and some!!!
just depends how you want to see how the " whatever pans out"
A set of figures I saw a month or so ago was more unjabbed dying than jabbed [ only based on a week ] something like 90 were unjabbed and less than 10 jabbed … covid is not a constant
Not quite sure regarding the table of rates,
But the table if you add those that had 1st dose & 2nd to give a total up against those that didn’t have it at all.. think that’s where the 70% comes in.. not yet done the maths but will have a study laters.
column 1 is total deaths [ specimen date ] of all age groups. Take off column2 non applicable deaths murdered/ rta/ etc? = total for specimen date. ignore under 18's == 3152- col 2 31 = 3121
column 3 unjabbed is 726
total sum of COLUMNS 4 & 5 & 6 = 2395 [ CHECK add 726 to 2395 = 3121 ]
columns 7 and 8 are per 100,000 peeps …. pertinent to Speciment date figures, not as part of population. My 0.00xx % figures are per population.
obviously each age group will be better or worse than a mean average. have fun