This has to stop
- Thread starter Makemstine Roger
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
I can’t remember the top dudes name anymore only her the second in command?
It's a tricky one. I fully agree that if someone hasn't broken forum rules they shouldn't be banned and buried without any reference to it by the mods. On the other hand if someone is only on here with an agenda to spread negativity then why allow them to do so.
To be honest I've seen enough of Wolfy/Pablo to come to the conclusion that he's a snide individual with an agenda and not the straight talker that some take him as. That's just my opinion and I appreciate that if you think he's a genuine Sunderland fan he should be allowed to post.
To be honest I've seen enough of Wolfy/Pablo to come to the conclusion that he's a snide individual with an agenda and not the straight talker that some take him as. That's just my opinion and I appreciate that if you think he's a genuine Sunderland fan he should be allowed to post.
see your feelings about it mate , but why delete everything if you have nothing to hide then do it on the quiet, he must be genuine because he came back as Pablo even when Wolfy was banned 1,300 likes 780 post a lot of board members liked what he wrote, not everyone agrees that's there prerogative but too many new posters are being banned without the chance to put their side forward, banning should be our decision not one individual with a crusade.
Last edited:
Agree wholeheartedly with this.
personally i think he's a WUM but if he's not broken any rules then i fail to see the reason for a ban. Then again to give the mods the benefit of the doubt we don't know what may have gone on behind the scenes
There is a closed room for mods to discuss individuals, however, we gained 1000’s of new members during the takeover so we should let **** slide imho as people bed in
Wolfy was banned by Armstrong he didn't like him, he came back as Pablo did nothing wrong and was still banned yet again, and to hide it he deleted his 20 odd posts which were all liked by the way. its time for us to ban not one individual with a crusade, or step aside for a more tolerant mod
You're right mate whatever's gone on there should be transparency. I don't agree with you about it but I do respect your point of view that he's a genuine poster and I can see why you're hacked off.
See I think Wolfy is ok, he is deffo a lads fan but likes to wind up, it’s his humour, if you talk straight to him he talks straight back
I think that GA and Marcus do a bloody good job personally. Must be more to it mrthinks
exactly i find him ok and have no problem so why does one person have the right to delete posts and bann its not ok
I think it’s time to see how it pans out now mate
Marcus does a cracking job people disagree with his points of view every week , but he doesn't have an axe to grind, its time Armstrong gave us a reason and we decide if a ban is needed
No mate he got banned only for what was posted on the thread i was contributing on, all of his reply's just went that's how i know
If I was a MOD I’d of banned the C**T ages ago.
Bart
Bart
but thats what im arguing for Bart, it should not be down to the individual with an axe to grind but the board to decide, I would go on to say every single person on this board has someone they don't like, you included you had an argument not that long ago ,but a board decision with a vote would make it faier, the guy should be reinstated and we are given reasons why and his posts were deleted, its only fair i hope you can see that and agree
- Status