Takeover (Covid-19/20)

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
The crux of the CAT case is that St James Holdings argument appears to be that the ODT Is anti-competitive because despite what the PL says, it is subjective.

Commercial interests intervene when the test Is whether the owners will treat the club and its history with respect, has the finances to run the club correctly and aren't disqualified under UK law.

The argument appears to be that having the PL as owners of the company by virtue of undertakings with each member club and acting as regulator is anti competitive.

It is very persuasive argument that many legsl experts agree with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schlem Boogerman
Excellent mate really it's nice to have a few more posters.

Feel free to tell me to **** off when I irritate you because that's actually one of my strengths

I enjoy reading the debates and opinions on here, I've spent too much time on twitter where everyone truly believes they know best and if your ideas are different then you need burning at a stake. At least from what I've seen on this forum you lot will explain your reasoning the best you can for why you feel or think a certain way, which again is a nice change from the dribble b***cks on twitter
 
I enjoy reading the debates and opinions on here, I've spent too much time on twitter where everyone truly believes they know best and if your ideas are different then you need burning at a stake. At least from what I've seen on this forum you lot will explain your reasoning the best you can for why you feel or think a certain way, which again is a nice change from the dribble b***cks on twitter

Twitter is full of idiots who seek validation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Munson.
I enjoy reading the debates and opinions on here, I've spent too much time on twitter where everyone truly believes they know best and if your ideas are different then you need burning at a stake. At least from what I've seen on this forum you lot will explain your reasoning the best you can for why you feel or think a certain way, which again is a nice change from the dribble b***cks on twitter

It's a good bunch.. Im definitely the biggest arsehole on here, so I hope you're not after my mantle.
 
Are you telling me my reverse psychology has come up trumps once again?

I'll be requiring sufficient evidence to believe that accolade

That's the case number on file.

If CAT is going ahead that means arbitration is either this week or potentially happened already/ at the same time.