question for athiests

so whatever suits?

 

Rubbish.

 

Pretty much, and doing his Muslim bros and sisses a massive disservice too

 

http://www.sciencealert.com.au/news/20112908-22550.html

 

No. I'm simply answering your question honestly which is more than you can manage.

 

truthfully who knows. But I understand that the functions of some are not 'useless' as previously thought

 

care to explain?

 

sorry some people argue (wrongly) that evolution explains the 'creation' of the universe
you are right there is nO evidence of species jumping

 

Who?

 

if, but, maybe

 

and 'honestly'

If we can 'see' certain things and come to certain conclusions eg we and all animals reproduce therefore dinosaurs reproducing is logical

we CAN also conclude logically that all things are created by something, therefore a creator is a logical conclusion?

 

Your original question has been answered repeatedly.
Do I accept that any of those answers are proven, personally?
No.

Something existing doesn't mean that it was created.

No.
Even if it did, then the creator would have to have a creator.
It's called infinite regress.

Yet some of them clearly are.
Why do we have a tail bone?
Why do we have wisdom teeth?
Why do we have the remains of a third eye-lid?
Wouldn't these vestigial remnants suggest that we evolved?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils

 

where is the overwhelming evidence that we once used them?

vestigial functions are more than just the coccyx and can it not just be that the coccyx serves as a support structure for muscles and acts as a shock absorber when sitting down?

as for the tails bit, a portruding or extended coccyx does NOT a tail make. kids are born with 6 fingers/toes. it happens

 

No, it isn't. I can show you proof of animals mating and producing young. You for example.

You can't show me any evidence of a creator.

is it sinking in yet?

 

Under law, if I didn't want it then yes it would be rape. This doesn't prove free will.

How about mental illness? Do sufferers choose to suffer?

 

you keep posting these links, yet i wonder if you have read them? this link actually supports my argument imo as it says things like

'..a tentative list'
..transitional fossils is essentially a misconception
...the fossil record is incomplete...

 

Show us evidence of a creator TFWNN.

If you can't it proves God doesn't exist.

 

there is no proof of dinosaurs mating yet you accept based on what we know

thats called hypocricy

unless you can show me some evidence of something out of nothing?

 

this is relevant how to the debate?

 

First of all, you don't understand what hypocrisy means.

Secondly, there's no evidence, none whatsoever, of a creator, so by your logic, God doesn't exist