Coronavirus. Just Coronavirus.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Steveo said:
So it looks like Freedom Day will be delayed a month until July 19th.
No guarantees even then, the way that the virus is now taking off - another 8,000 cases today.

criminal negligence from PM Johnson who has ruined summer for everyone due to allowing hundreds of infected Indians into the country. I thought the whole point of Brexit was to protect our borders!
Click to expand...

What a surprise the ‘Blame Boris’ broken record has not been put out of our misery.

Did you get that from your senior NHS doctors again? Total Facebook fantasist. If you had laminated your poster of Wee Jimmy McKrankie, you would have been able to wipe the cum off it after you had tossed yourself off.
 
DUNCAN DONUTS said:
I'm not here to spoon feed you your information the NHS were duty bound to explain this to you when you rolled up your sleeve .

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-vaccine-monitoring-idUSKBN2AC2G3


The post correctly notes that the Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus vaccine has been given an “estimated study completion date” of Jan. 31, 2023 (here). For the COVID-19 vaccine created by Moderna, studies are expected to end on Oct. 27, 2022 (here).



Do you know what study completion date means you stupid old **** ?
Click to expand...

Which bit of “it is standard practice for safety monitoring to continue after a vaccine has been approved for use” are you struggling to understand?

The article specifically refers to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine in the United States. They have their rules and we have ours; and I had the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine that had been properly approved by the British regulator.

Another thirty seconds on Google, find something where the two line synopsis reads like what you want to post and do not actually bother to read it. So you are still a long way from quoting any credible sources.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
QuarterMoonII said:
Which bit of “it is standard practice for safety monitoring to continue after a vaccine has been approved for use” are you struggling to understand?

The article specifically refers to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine in the United States. They have their rules and we have ours; and I had the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine that had been properly approved by the British regulator.

Another thirty seconds on Google, find something where the two line synopsis reads like what you want to post and do not actually bother to read it. So you are still a long way from quoting any credible sources.
Click to expand...
When did they invent the Oxford/AZ vaccine ?

Why were they given legal indemnity from death or injury ?

I'm sure your mum thought taking thalidomide for morning sickness was perfectly safe too .
 
  • Like
Reactions: EDGE.
QuarterMoonII said:
Which bit of “it is standard practice for safety monitoring to continue after a vaccine has been approved for use” are you struggling to understand?

The article specifically refers to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine in the United States. They have their rules and we have ours; and I had the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine that had been properly approved by the British regulator.

Another thirty seconds on Google, find something where the two line synopsis reads like what you want to post and do not actually bother to read it. So you are still a long way from quoting any credible sources.
Click to expand...

General
  • This temporary Authorisation under Regulation 174 permits the supply to and by the Crown of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, based on the safety, quality and efficacy data submitted by AstraZeneca (AZ) to MHRA in the period from 24/09/2020 to 29/12/2020 December 2020.

  • This authorisation is not a marketing authorisation for the purposes of Part 5 of the HMRs or Chapter 4 of Title III to the 2001 Directive.

  • This authorisation applies to the supply within the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EDGE. and DUNCAN DONUTS
DUNCAN DONUTS said:
When did they invent the Oxford/AZ vaccine ?

Why were they given legal indemnity from death or injury ?

I'm sure your mum thought taking thalidomide for morning sickness was perfectly safe too .
Click to expand...

You are losing the argument on the various plague vaccines so now you are going to switch to any other old controversial drug. Without even bothering to Google it, I know that thalidomide was not given to absolutely every pregnant woman; and how can I possibly comment on whether my mother had morning sickness?
 
JohnHumbles said:
General
  • This temporary Authorisation under Regulation 174 permits the supply to and by the Crown of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, based on the safety, quality and efficacy data submitted by AstraZeneca (AZ) to MHRA in the period from 24/09/2020 to 29/12/2020 December 2020.

  • This authorisation is not a marketing authorisation for the purposes of Part 5 of the HMRs or Chapter 4 of Title III to the 2001 Directive.

  • This authorisation applies to the supply within the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Click to expand...

Go on, give us a clue what point you are trying to make.

You are quoting British regulators for Oxford/AstraZeneca. He was quoting American regulators for Pfizer/BioNTech. <doh>
 
QuarterMoonII said:
You are losing the argument on the various plague vaccines so now you are going to switch to any other old controversial drug. Without even bothering to Google it, I know that thalidomide was not given to absolutely every pregnant woman; and how can I possibly comment on whether my mother had morning sickness?
Click to expand...
As the previous poster points out the rushed vaccine roll outs are not standard practice by any stretch of the imagination and you are part of the trial.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EDGE.
Toby said:
The best way is to not vote for the ****s in the first place...

In the US, where the alleged Communist plot to change the world was meant to be taking place, they're ****ing off their restrictions and going back to normal.

Here? Extended lockdown and more to come.

Whose fault is it? The Tory ****s.

Anyone that voted for them should be ****ing ashamed of themselves.
Click to expand...

I would agree if it weren’t the fact that Labour and Libdems would’ve done the exact same thing.

I despise Johnson and wish Starmer would stop being a ****ing duplicate of him.

There is zero chance of them getting voted out as they have made it nigh on impossible for them to be held to account and the truth being told as the Opposition are wanting more restrictions and the press are agents of the State.
 
Lochers said:
I would agree if it weren’t the fact that Labour and Libdems would’ve done the exact same thing.

I despise Johnson and wish Starmer would stop being a ****ing duplicate of him.

There is zero chance of them getting voted out as they have made it nigh on impossible for them to be held to account and the truth being told as the Opposition are wanting more restrictions and the press are agents of the State.
Click to expand...
There is no opposition other than a handful of Tory scum MPs with a spine.

Labour either abstain or agree with the lockdowns and other bullshit if anything they insist that Bozo isn't being tough enough on the UK public, the SNP are not exactly anti lockdown either .

They are all puppets only low IQ spastics believe voting makes any difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benvenuto Cellini and EDGE.
Conservatives believe in low taxes, fiscal prudence, that men are free to do as they choose within the law and above all else, personal responsibility and Liberty.

The Tory scum in charge are not Conservative in any way, shape or form.
 
Lochers said:
Conservatives believe in low taxes, fiscal prudence, that men are free to do as they choose within the law and above all else, personal responsibility and Liberty.

The Tory scum in charge are not Conservative in any way, shape or form.
Click to expand...
They are pretty much a carbon copy of the Blair government minus the illegal wars .

On their Twitter page they have the homo rainbow logo and the World Economic Forum great reset motto

Build back better .

Globalist puppets


You must log in or register to see images
 
Lochers said:
The only way to stop them is to stop complying with their rules and their Science.

The mass coercion to get vaccinated has led us to having more rules and restrictions than this time last year.

When will people wake up?

They have no intention of taking their foot off our necks until we all say ‘no more’.

Unfortunately, too many of us are either suffering from Stockholm syndrome or actually enjoy feeling “protected” by the State.

Weak and fearful men ultimately.
Click to expand...

I appreciate that you are a bit mentally challenged but it is quite easy to understand really.
The roadmap was progressing quite well until PM Johnson let the Indian variant into the country.
It is more transmissible and so therefore we need to get more people vaccinated against it - especially the second dose.
Keep up will you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toby
DUNCAN DONUTS said:
The opposition are not very vocal about ending the lockdown, If anything they complain that the Tory scum are not doing enough .
Click to expand...

with the infection rate rising then obviously we should be locking down more, it is not exactly difficult to understand.
 
QuarterMoonII said:
What a surprise the ‘Blame Boris’ broken record has not been put out of our misery.

Did you get that from your senior NHS doctors again? Total Facebook fantasist. If you had laminated your poster of Wee Jimmy McKrankie, you would have been able to wipe the cum off it after you had tossed yourself off.
Click to expand...

and who do you blame for the Indian variant taking hold in the country then ?
 
DUNCAN DONUTS said:
As the previous poster points out the rushed vaccine roll outs are not standard practice by any stretch of the imagination and you are part of the trial.
Click to expand...

the vaccine was not rushed out, it had to go through many safety tests.

Sad that so many people are so ill informed.
It of course explains the scared, hysterical responses by some on here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
Steveo said:
with the infection rate rising then obviously we should be locking down more, it is not exactly difficult to understand.
Click to expand...
All vulnerable people have been given the choice of taking the life saving cure.

So the dirty Indians and unvaccinated can't infect them they are immune.

Can you explain your desire to stay locked down longer ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back