Nah i just need spurly bro.
All in good time
Once the original details come out it can go to a poll for the good people of not606 to decide.
Not606 Graveyard thread
- Thread starter PINKIE
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Once the original details come out it can go to a poll for the good people of not606 to decide.
TBF @Sucky you ****ing changed our bet half way through the season.
Greenwood vs Brewster - most goals in a season. Greenwood was at United, Brewster at Liverpool. Greenwood storms into an early lead and Sucky’s boy gets loaned to Swansea, then you said Championship goals count as well, like a **** tryna pull a technical loophole one me, and the fat kid still lost
Greenwood vs Brewster - most goals in a season. Greenwood was at United, Brewster at Liverpool. Greenwood storms into an early lead and Sucky’s boy gets loaned to Swansea, then you said Championship goals count as well, like a **** tryna pull a technical loophole one me, and the fat kid still lost
Im not looking for **** bruv. I know i won, they know i won, we all know i won. And should accept the consequences of what they both agreed to.
Thats it really.
Yeh and you said they didnt, and that clause wasnt in the written up bet so of course i accepted and you won.TBF @Sucky you ****ing changed our bet half way through the season.
Greenwood vs Brewster - most goals in a season. Greenwood was at United, Brewster at Liverpool. Greenwood storms into an early lead and Sucky’s boy gets loaned to Swansea, then you said Championship goals count as well, like a **** tryna pull a technical loophole one me, and the fat kid still lost
So thanks for bringing that up as id forgotten
Im not looking for **** bruv. I know i won, they know i won, we all know i won. And should accept the consequences of what they both agreed to.
Thats it really.
I've said nowt up to this point but have just re read it mate.
There is no & between beating Liverpool and Winning a Pot.
Therefore, that side of the bet you lost.
Ancellotti ****ed off first though of course, so that bit you win.
Null and void surely? Equaled out.
(soz)
Yeh and you said they didnt, and that clause wasnt in the written up bet so of course i accepted and you won.
So thanks for bringing that up as id forgotten
I won either way bro, mainly cos I’m a ****ing G and secondly cos Brewster is a fat pig. Thanks for taking the L tho bro.
Was he? I take pretty much everything on here as banter, especially anything hiag wrote. How could I get angry with a guy that loaded the gun for his own firing squad?
Im not looking for **** bruv. I know i won, they know i won, we all know i won. And should accept the consequences of what they both agreed to.
Thats it really.
Reckon it'd be easy enough to find. Just look at the date of Slurps post and check the match fred for the same day / day before.
I've been bedridden for the past two days so might even take a look myself
My understanding of their bet that I never really paid attention to was as follows:
If Ancelotti wins a trophy at Everton Sucky has to give up his avi/username for a year.
If Klopp gets fired before Ancelotti then Sucky loses and has to take the same punishment.
If Ancelotti gets fired before Klopp then Peej or Tobes have to take the L.
Like I say, there’s no detail because nobody can point to the original bet, but swap ‘gets fired’ for ‘leaves’ and that could make a big difference, which is why we need to see the original terms as we could have a winner.
If Ancelotti wins a trophy at Everton Sucky has to give up his avi/username for a year.
If Klopp gets fired before Ancelotti then Sucky loses and has to take the same punishment.
If Ancelotti gets fired before Klopp then Peej or Tobes have to take the L.
Like I say, there’s no detail because nobody can point to the original bet, but swap ‘gets fired’ for ‘leaves’ and that could make a big difference, which is why we need to see the original terms as we could have a winner.
I understood it as that Ancelotti would both beat Liverpool and win a pot before he left Everton.
As I recall, Tobes isn't denying that either. Rather he's saying that he actually meant for the 'duration of contract' so the bet is void.
Tobes has already said it was both win a cup and beat Liverpool he is just wriggling on a 4 year contract hook at present
QUOTE="Always loved City me like, post: 14936551, member: 1021792"]My bet was **** all to with with who left first. It was that Ancelotti would both beat Liverpool and win a pot during his 4 year contract.[/QUOTE]
Are you absolutely certain about that @Chief ?
I take it then you've found the orginal bet then....
Should Post it up geeza
Take your time
[/QUOTE]
Do you see anything regarding 4 years or carlo serving his full contract in the op, or that him leaving of his own free will null and voids the bet? Or that the bet is for 4 years or its null and void?
Nope.. I didnt think so
No clauses whatsoever.This
There was no duration of contract clause either.
Carlo had to beat Liverpool in a game and win a pot before he or klopp left either club.
He didnt.
I win