First of all, you quoted KingHotspur back at me, which is not only odd because I had already read that comment - hence I replied to it - but the fact you can't seem to remember this doesn't exactly help your argument
Secondly, you see that part where you say that Leicester won something, then failed to come close to sustaining that form? Yeah, that's what is known as "Exactly what I have said from the beginning", hence I keep referring back to the No Man's Land between Point A and Point B and you seem to...let me check...yup, you just keep on ignoring that part even though it's the basis of my argument, which is definitely going to have me taking you seriously the longer you keep responding
Thirdly, are you really going to start playing Top Trumps now? In the period where we've gone through two managers, would you like to tell me how many Leicester have gone though? Here, let me tell you: three. Ranieri was sacked a few months into the season after winning the league, Claude Puel came in for a couple of seasons and it's not an exaggeration to say that he was a disaster, and then they hired Rodgers. Why do I bring this up? Because my argument is specifically the Claude Puel part of that time period, the part you pretended didn't happen, which takes me back to the simple question: do you think Spurs fans would be happy if, in the two years after winning the league, they'd gone through two caretakers and a bloke who lost more games than they won? Because I can answer that one for you: no
What is delusional is you thinking you have a grasp of the mindset of Spurs fans, or to be more accurate the section of Spurs fans looking for an excuse to lose their ****, even though it is abundantly clear that you don't even when I actually spell this out for you several times, because you've decided to double down on being a moaning sod who isn't interested in actually engaging in something known as "adult conversation" and instead want to monologue about something you have no understanding of but want to pretend that you're an expert on even though, by this point, all you're really doing is justifying my calling it the Pond Life board for a couple of years at least by this point due to it being filled with people who can't engage in this thing called "adult conversation" because they want to be a bunch of sneering bores who simply cannot accept that they're talking ****e even though that's all the board exists for
So when I tell you that if Spurs won the league then ended up finishing seventh that will see a section of the fanbase - one that KingHotspur just so happens to represent - losing their ****, I'm not doing it out of speculation, I'm doing it because that section of the fanbase has a track record of taking any excuse to kick off another moaning campaign, for example one summer when we sold our fourth-choice RB who had the grand total of one sub appearance in the first team as a sign that we were going to be selling Harry Kane, Son Heung-min and Christian Eriksen that summer because something something Levy Out, which is the exact sort of reactionary claptrap we rip the piss out of AFTV over
The point is that strawman arguments and getting arsey when I point out you're talking crap isn't going to help me, and I'm perfectly fine with that. In fact, I'll just sit here knowing what I'm talking about and doing so to anyone who'''...well "listen" isn't the word as that's clearly not happening, but it looks like the Sunny D is wearing off on a few of them so I'll just sit right here and wait and see who else wants to keep missing the bloody point
a measure of Spurs 'success' is a stock pic of a Thai girl protesting against the Thai government ...
