Match Day Thread General matchday thread.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
[QUOTE="Peej, post: 14850152, member: 1024114"]indont or Everton?

finance isn’t really my thing, I like going to the games and getting a few beers in.
Turnover ratio is a great thing......[/QUOTE]

Not sure what Eskimos have to do with it, but yeah, Everton, and their ratio of trophies to net spend, to put it into that context. <cool>
 
Tobes said:
Yada, Yada...context is everything.

I was replying to a post decrying the ‘vulgarity’ of Chelsea’s spending and just put it into context.

Kopites crying about clubs like Chelsea gate crashing their party whilst they’ve done £1BN themselves is a tad rich.
Click to expand...

I was just putting the £1bn in context mate. Im sure you're well aware that just saying £1bn spend out of context is utterly meaningless. Or at least I'm sure you would be if it was applied to anyone else than Liverpool. :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sucky
Special Patrol Group said:
I was just putting the £1bn in context mate. Im sure you're well aware that just saying £1bn spend out of context is utterly meaningless. Or at least I'm sure you would be if it was applied to anyone else than Liverpool. :biggrin:
Click to expand...

a billion. ****ing hell, a billion pounds. Leicester didn’t spend that did they Fosse?
 
Tobes said:
Yada, Yada...context is everything.

I was replying to a post decrying the ‘vulgarity’ of Chelsea’s spending and just put it into context.

Kopites crying about clubs like Chelsea gate crashing their party whilst they’ve done £1BN themselves is a tad rich.
Click to expand...
Half a billion quid it took roman to buy the chavs 1st ever European cup.

Granted Its far less vulgar than city's 2billion on players and staff in less than a decade.

But its vulgar all the same.

Our spends are not compatible in real life.

You know that tho.
 
Special Patrol Group said:
I was just putting the £1bn in context mate. Im sure you're well aware that just saying £1bn spend out of context is utterly meaningless. Or at least I'm sure you would be if it was applied to anyone else than Liverpool. :biggrin:
Click to expand...
Nail and head.

Thats your answer<laugh>
 
Peej said:
a billion. ****ing hell, a billion pounds. Leicester didn’t spend that did they Fosse?
Click to expand...


£.75bn in sales. ****ing hell, three-quarters of a billion in sales, the second-most in the Premier League! Leicester didn't sell that much did they Fosse?
 
Sucky said:
Half a billion quid it took roman to buy the chavs 1st ever European cup.

Granted Its far less vulgar than city's 2billion on players and staff in less than a decade.

But its vulgar all the same.

Our spends are not compatible in real life.

You know that tho.
Click to expand...


You must log in or register to see images


When falling flat, use net spend.
 
pieguts said:
Leicesters title winning squad was assembled using 6 books of green shield stamps and some luncheon vouchers, if you listen to there fans. A miracle I tell you, a miracle!
Click to expand...

no need for Claudio to spend 1Bn. Or transfer record players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pieguts
Peej said:
You must log in or register to see images


When falling flat, use net spend.
Click to expand...

If you want to use falling flat and net spend in the same sentence you might want to refer to your own trophy haul and net spend since 2003. Just a tip. :emoticon-0148-yes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back