A good move regardless of takeover
Come back once you've had a thinkOh, bog off ffs.
He's a sub-standard, dogshit player - new contracts for crap like this tell me a) our lofty heights of ambition remain firmly in place and b) there's no ****ing takeover whatsoever.
I actually have no words. Why give a player a contract for 3 years when your not even playing him, being a striker, in a striker roll and yet he’s playing Fraser in said striker role when he’s a winger?Oh, bog off ffs.
He's a sub-standard, dogshit player - new contracts for crap like this tell me a) our lofty heights of ambition remain firmly in place and b) there's no ****ing takeover whatsoever.
Oh, bog off ffs.
He's a sub-standard, dogshit player - new contracts for crap like this tell me a) our lofty heights of ambition remain firmly in place and b) there's no ****ing takeover whatsoever.
Steve doesn’t play him? He chooses wingers in the striker position?I think it's a case of preparing for the championship.
Steve doesn’t play him? He chooses wingers in the striker position?
Why give him a three year contract?
Wilson will your right. But Joe is the no9.It's about next season in the Championship.
Gayle will be our no9
Wilson will be sold
How reduced are those terms?
Wilson will your right. But Joe is the no9.
And that’s why I don’t understand why Bruce isn’t playing Gayle in Wilson’s absence?
Adds value to the player.I actually have no words. Why give a player a contract for 3 years when your not even playing him, being a striker, in a striker roll and yet he’s playing Fraser in said striker role when he’s a winger?
Something is seriously wrong with these guys?
Adds value to the player.