Rangers v Celtic

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Ciaran said:
Your reasoning for Rangers cutting the Celtic allocation at the OL.
Click to expand...
No it's not. It's a cast iron reason.

We've got a waiting list of nearly 20k to get into the Big House, the 7k Celtic fans paying £50 which equates to roughly £700k and they wreck toilets and seats etc.

Or we could sell full price Season tickets at £500 which coins £3.5m for the Ibrokes outfit.

We want more of our fans to see our team, not an unreasonable request.

Maybe if we go back to a 100k stadium, then you'll get 8000 tickets but until our grandkids are Celtic fans, then we will fill Ibrox for the next 10 years easily.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toley Fart
Bulbous Purple Helmet said:
You said it was retaliation?

Have you done a mindy, Mindy?
Click to expand...
I don't think you know what retaliation is.

You took a huff because we spanked you multiple times and tied scarves to your goalposts. Your ***** fans invaded the pitch to attack our captain. Your fan groups pled to cut our allocation because you felt sad.

You made an emotional decision to cut out allocation.

Celtic tried to talk to you about this silly decision but you had you head in a bucket of ice cream

So Celtic matched your actions.

It wasn’t an emotional decision for Celtic

Want a tissue?
 
Mind The Duck said:
I don't think you know what retaliation is.

You took a huff because we spanked you multiple times and tied scarves to your goalposts. Your ***** fans invaded the pitch to attack our captain. Your fan groups pled to cut our allocation because you felt sad.

You made an emotional decision to cut out allocation.

Celtic tried to talk to you about this silly decision but you had you head in a bucket of ice cream

So Celtic matched your actions.

It wasn’t an emotional decision for Celtic

Want a tissue?
Click to expand...
Twas you that mentioned retaliation you bumbling oaf.

How was it a silly decision to cut Celtic's allocation? Should the Rangers board discount the tens of thousands of Rangers fans who want to watch their heroes at Ibrox so that Celtic fans can wreck the toilets and seats twice a season?

If it was such a silly decision then why did Celtic copy them?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pattern Of Assistance
It’s ruins the atmosphere but when you’re haemorrhaging money like TRIFC LTD then needs must methinks
 
Bulbous Purple Helmet said:
Twas you that mentioned retaliation you bumbling oaf.

How was it a silly decision to cut Celtic's allocation? Should the Rangers board discount the tens of thousands of Rangers fans who want to watch their heroes at Ibrox so that Celtic fans can wreck the toilets and seats twice a season?

If it was such a silly decision then why did Celtic copy them?
Click to expand...
Celtic fans took soap to ibrox <laugh>

Even though the hun hordes regularly wrecked Celtic Park facilities (see George Square as an example) we never look to ban your fans.

Removing opposition fans ruins the atmosphere and gives more of an advantage to the home side.

You couldn't stand Celtic fans partying in your stadium like it was a home game <laugh>

Once again, Celtic retaliated because of your cry baby move and only after trying to convince you to reverse it.

Snowflakes
 
Mind The Duck said:
Celtic fans took soap to ibrox <laugh>

Even though the hun hordes regularly wrecked Celtic Park facilities (see George Square as an example) we never look to ban your fans.

Removing opposition fans ruins the atmosphere and gives more of an advantage to the home side.

You couldn't stand Celtic fans partying in your stadium like it was a home game <laugh>

Once again, Celtic retaliated because of your cry baby move and only after trying to convince you to reverse it.

Snowflakes
Click to expand...
Double smiley beel.

I've logically told you the reasons why Rangers cut the Celtic allocation.

You've made no factual case for your theory other than to launch smileys and infer something that doesn't make sense about silly decisions and retaliation.

How has this supposed home advantage panned out? Assume both home teams have 100% records against their rivals?

In your own time Mindy.
 
You ****s are insane Rangers are 20 points ahead and haven't won the title in years and you are fighting about who's fans are worse at destroying toilets.

It took a rookie English manager to do it <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: monacoger and EDGE.
DUNCAN DONUTS said:
You ****s are insane Rangers are 20 points ahead and haven't won the title in years and you are fighting about who's fans are worse at destroying toilets.

It took a rookie English manager to do it <laugh>
Click to expand...
We have a peculiar rivalry.

Both fans used to revel in the sectarian stuff, the Ulster issues and Glaswegians have been historically been tough guys.

But then Celtic went soft, they complained about sectarianism and wanted bad words banned because it made them cry. It turns out that they were bad losers.

When they win, Rangers can sing songs about stuff and they are fine but when they lose, they turn the volume up to listen to bad words.

Celtic fans won the triple triple and thousands of them congregated at the Gallowgate and drank and partied to the hearts content. Good on them I say.

Rangers do it and the Tims in the media and politics round on us and make it out as if we rioted.

George Square was littered with drink and fireworks. So was Gallowgate.

It's no big deal in the grand scheme of things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ciaran and Toley Fart
Toley Fart said:
dembele last minute winner at Hampden :(

Last one at Ibrokes was the Sone Aluko show.
Click to expand...

Well, having been to several, I honestly haven't noticed any difference.

I was one of the 800 chosen to go to Parkhead in the first season of reduced allocations and it was some buzz.

The pillar took up a 3rd of the pitch <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toley Fart
Bulbous Purple Helmet said:
Double smiley beel.

I've logically told you the reasons why Rangers cut the Celtic allocation.

You've made no factual case for your theory other than to launch smileys and infer something that doesn't make sense about silly decisions and retaliation.

How has this supposed home advantage panned out? Assume both home teams have 100% records against their rivals?

In your own time Mindy.
Click to expand...
I've told you exactly why it happened.

You are giving excuses for your clubs childish behaviour.

https://newsroom.mastercard.com/eu/...s-and-celebrations-reveals-secret-to-winning/

Here is an article on how fans can boost a players performance by 8% which may, possibly, relate to home fan advantages
 
Bulbous Purple Helmet said:
Well, having been to several, I honestly haven't noticed any difference.

I was one of the 800 chosen to go to Parkhead in the first season of reduced allocations and it was some buzz.

The pillar took up a 3rd of the pitch <laugh>
Click to expand...

not that I’m complaining. Just from the neutral sky tv observer it’s not as good as it was.

I mute the tv anyway in case I hear sectarian singing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ciaran and EDGE.
Mind The Duck said:
I've told you exactly why it happened.

You are giving excuses for your clubs childish behaviour.

https://newsroom.mastercard.com/eu/...s-and-celebrations-reveals-secret-to-winning/

Here is an article on how fans can boost a players performance by 8% which may, possibly, relate to home fan advantages
Click to expand...
So both teams have a 100% win record at home, Mindy?

Genuine question.

I've just checked and both teams lost their home games last season.

So... about that theory of yours...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back