Just seen a comment where somebody said that Oprah Winfrey looks like Ian Wright dressed as Miss Doubtfire
You must log in or register to see images
Hazza and megs
- Thread starter Sucky
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
I Coulda just gone full 1987 and used
You must log in or register to see images
But ours are all wood apparently
fkin Fosse come lately again
From a WhatsApp group I'm in ... not particularly interested in the subject myself, so haven't read the thread ... but that I did find funny ... other ones I couldn't put up without risking a ban
From a WhatsApp group I'm in ... not particularly interested in the subject myself, so haven't read the thread ... but that I did find funny ... other ones I couldn't put up without risking a ban
Gwan Fos, stick em up
That’s not a Clint reference btw
Send em to @duggie2000 he don't give a **** that lad.From a WhatsApp group I'm in ... not particularly interested in the subject myself, so haven't read the thread ... but that I did find funny ... other ones I couldn't put up without risking a ban
Usually on the roof mate, nip out with a torch and have a lookI'll have to wait til about 11 and get it on the hub.
Can't find the TV aerial and cba to look for it either
Before you ask I don't watch normal TV so never need the aerial
Nah no roof aerial here.Usually on the roof mate, nip out with a torch and have a look
Room one works fine.
Not usually a problem for me as I don't watch old skool telly channels and she watches that **** next door if I'm in.
I watched the interview. Nowt surprised me about what they both said, I think Harry & Meghan are both better off out of it. The Royal Family have chance here to name and shame and drag themselves into the 21st Century, but as always, I doubt they will. As for the media, bunch of shhites. It's like watching Diana all over again, no lessons learned from the past. Luckily Harry's got his head screwed on and made his own choices, despite the dumbnuts removing his security without notice. Thankfully that didn't get out at the time, otherwise you'd have had every fruitloop in the world heading in his direction.
Megz just went up a few notches.
You must log in or register to see media
If ya know ya know.
I don't think they moved there to escape racism, I got the impression they moved there to escape the system, I assume the psychology of miles, that young runaways normally tend to apply.
The interview also highlighted the British Media, how they reported on Meghan compared to similar situations reported on Kate. It was a systematic abuse by the media in this country.
Their first intentions was to go to Canada, but something occurred, I think due to changes implemented by the Palace, as they had still intended to serve the public. Then someone (celebrity I think) came forward and offered them residence and security in California.
I think they have now settled with money left to Harry by his mum Diana. I will let others fill in the gaps, or correct any bits I've got wrong/misunderstood.
They moved to Canada and intended to carry on the work of minor royals. The palace then told them they wouldn’t be able to and also stripped them of their status along with the security detail that went with it.
If that wasn’t ****ty enough, the Tory rag Daily Fail exposed to the world exactly where they were living. Harry said that those two things coupled with an impending covid lockdown made them feel extremely vulnerable, so they upped sticks to LA
That was it and for the first time in his life he was going to be faced with having no personal security, while the media were doing their usual hatchet job, The Fail and The Sun. Hence why that guy stepped forward and not only gave them residence but security, until such time they were able to sort it out for themselves.