Takeover (Covid-19/20)

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
It was a planned "loss" by Nick De Marco. Have the panel names made public so that there is transparency. They wanted the arbitration panels decision made public. That will now happen.


So would that decision show all the grisly details? Or just what they see as relevant?
 
And the PL didn’t want that. It feels like a loss mate reading the full transcript and reading the PL arguments as to why they want KSA to be a director does sound quite convincing!

They want KSA to be classed as a person due to the level of control MBS has over PIF. They can then be a director and subjected to the test. We know what will happen then.
 
So how will he possibly remain impartial? Or given the sheer scale and publicity (Nicks plan) will he actually be slightly biased the other way. To preserve impartiality. Is that what Nicks plan is?
he can't

it like having your Uncle as Judge
and your family and cousins as Jury
when you're up before court

The public will not see a fair trial
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sheikh_of_Araby