Off Topic Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
This is a link to how a woman was denied PIP as a result of the nurse talking to her in a face to face interview having lied in the report.
It’s bad enough that this type of thing is still happening, and wouldn’t have been revealed if her partner had not recorded the interview, but a large portion of the blame lies with the process that could be changed by the government.
People with lifelong debilitating and/or disabling conditions and/or terminal illness should never have to go through this inhumane process, when they have sufficient evidence from specialist consultants that they are in need of this support.
Even after her claim was agreed on appeal and punitive costs added, ATOS refused to pay out, until she sent in debt collectors.
Shameful.

https://www.disabilitynewsservice.c...GeqjQ7L_ZDVVTHM_JLwS-K1eD-N3MHF7wATD5wYdXrfEs
 
Received notification of the Census today, a letter with a log on code etc.
Supposed to be done on Sunday 21st March, but can be done sooner if you want, as long as the information entered would be the same as if left until the 21st.
I think it is great that one member of the household is allowed to enter the relevant information for everyone living in the household, rather than everyone have to enter their own information separately.
Thinking about suggesting this system to the government, for registering voters, rather than make individuals register themselves, to ensure that every eligible person gets registered. Do you think they will go for it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: davecg69
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56295061

Top level discussions have taken place within Downing Street about how to pay for renovations to Boris Johnson's official flat, the BBC understands.

Sources said setting up a charity to allow members of the public to donate towards the revamp has been considered to cover the cost.

Are they ****ing joking (if true)
 
  • Like
Reactions: davecg69
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56295061

Top level discussions have taken place within Downing Street about how to pay for renovations to Boris Johnson's official flat, the BBC understands.

Sources said setting up a charity to allow members of the public to donate towards the revamp has been considered to cover the cost.

Are they ****ing joking (if true)

I’m happy to go in and paint/wallpaper for them. I think at £1 billion it would be considered a bargain .....
 
Received notification of the Census today, a letter with a log on code etc.
Supposed to be done on Sunday 21st March, but can be done sooner if you want, as long as the information entered would be the same as if left until the 21st.
I think it is great that one member of the household is allowed to enter the relevant information for everyone living in the household, rather than everyone have to enter their own information separately.
Thinking about suggesting this system to the government, for registering voters, rather than make individuals register themselves, to ensure that every eligible person gets registered. Do you think they will go for it?

I did ours this morning (after having received 3 letters). Funnily enough, as I was nearly finished another 2 came through the letter box together.

One was in a red envelope and was the first one to actually point out that it is a legal requirement to provide the info. All the others were akin to a prize draw competition invite, with a £15 voucher on offer .
 
She is not a woman I like. It is difficult to have any affection for anyone who has an unbalanced hatred of the English.

Enjoyed this post very much, but I'm not even sure this is true. She loathes the fact that an out of touch political elite talking out of their arses in Westminster can so greatly affect the life chances of her fellow citizens. So do I. Covid has highlighted the gross inequalities of our political system which is partly a result of the ever-greater centarlisation of deciision making and consequent lack of accountability.

It's interesting that so called 'freedom-loving' conservatives fear devolution of power. Sturgeon wants independence for Scotland, but in a sense this simply captures what a lot of us want - to have more local control and accountability. I used to like the fact that my local council ran our schools, for example. Not because they were bleeding marvellous at doing it, but the fact that if they cocked up I knew who to bollock and could turn him/her/them out come polling day. Now schools are run by academy chains overseen by faceless bureaucrats that I can't get to.

It's interesting that in France, Macron has scrapped Taxe d'habitation. This is like council tax and pays for local services. In France the communes have a deal of autonomy. Of course doing away with a tax is always popular, but I'm not convinced that this is not a simple piece of drawing control back to the centre. In a French commune if you're not happy about something whether it's the state of your roads or a plan to build a wind farm next door to your house then you get yourself down to the Mairie. The mayors of even the smallest communes exercise enormous power and are directly accountable - after all he/she lives in the commune and can be collared by their constituents at the boulangerie.

I'd quite like devolution for North West England. I do wonder whether the fear about Sturgeon is where the demands for greater local control will end. It's much easier if you're in a clearly defined country, like Scotland. But it's only geography.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Ides of March
It is interesting to read the comments about Starmer and Sturgeon who have not enjoyed the best of weeks! I have to say that I really dislike Sturgeon but I just think this is because it is almost impossible to find fault with what she has to say. No other politician in Europe is pushing for a liberal society with such intent that I am really surprised that she has not become a cause celebre on a wider, global scale. The Salmond enquiry had threatened to derail and undermine her yet no killer punches have been landed and her reputation has not really suffered. She has admitted her faults and errors in a way that would be totally alien to Boris. She is not a woman I like. It is difficult to have any affection for anyone who has an unbalanced hatred of the English. Despite this, the logic of her arguments are frequently so strong that I think she is unassailable. For my money, she is the ultimate politician of our time and has re-imagined the SNP in her image. Salmond was a wily politician but one who has made bad judgement calls and something of a pantomime villain. It has been fun watching his stock decline. By comparison, Sturgeon combines his savvy whilst constantly ensuring that she is seen not to have done anything that might jeopardise her integrity. She is a very smart political animal.

What I find strange is that Sturgeon could have really projected her mantra over a much larger stage. Newspapers like the Express are constantly publishing hostile articles about her and you can appreciate why there is a genuine hatred towards her throughout much of England. What doesn't get reported is just how good she is even though I read somewhere in the week that she actually enjoys a far larger following in England that a rag like the Express would make you believe. With her liberal viewpoint coupled with her management of her political party, she enjoys far more clout that a country with a population with 6 million people should. There are elements of Sturgeon which actually recall Margaret Thatcher with regard to her aloofness yet, whilst their politics were an ocean apart, I would reluctantly argue that Nicola Sturgeon is the greater politician.

Anyone who believes in democracy can see that Scotland deserves another referendum as the situation in 2021 is totally different from 2014. Scotland is now marooned outside of the EU and shackled to another union where it will always remain a bit part player, even if batting above itself. There is no doubt that Scotland would do far better under Sturgeon. I think that the whole of Europe would benefit from someone with her outlook. Her liberal views are unimpeachable and I think that her gender is an asset and ensures that she projects something truly different to the kind of politicians we have been used to in the past. It is really difficult, even if you dislike her, to disagree with her comments. Few politicians have consistently been right as often as she has. I cannot recall her ever been proved to be incorrect. If you like, she has the potential to be the Obama of our time.

However, I think that there is another side to tis argument. At the moment the only credible opposition to the Tories is the SNP. They are the only people landing blows on Boris and they are ones which always hurt. In comparison, Labour under Starmer have become ineffectual and, I am sorry to say, totally pointless. It is weird situation because Sturgeon's arguments about Scotland also apply to the rest of the UK in many instances. Starmer does not have the personality of Sturgeon and nor does he have the ability to present arguments which seem as cast iron as Sturgeons. Sturgeon is everything Starmer is not. Unfortunately, as soon as Scotland becomes independent, I think Boris will have a much easier life post-Sturgeon. As long as he continues to deny the Scots another referendum, Scotland will always appear to be the victim. Whilst Scotland may receive money from Westminster, it clearly gets little governance from there! It is a shame that someone of Sturgeon's ability is fated to perform on a small stage - both for the same of her own country and also as credible opposition for this government, She is effectively the Leader of the Opposition but also a politician capable of being a more significant player on a global stage.
Pretty much bang on, except the bit about her hating the English. She doesn`t. She loves Scotland, and hates the Westminster establishment.
 
Yeah, the rise of Scottish nationalism isn't really a byproduct of hatred of the English, because let's be real here: the Scottish weren't head-over-heels for England pre-2015. If love of England was ever a prerequisite for union it'd have died out as soon as the debts for the Darien scheme were paid*. Rather, it's that there's now a fairly compelling argument that Scotland has a better idea of what is good for Scotland than Great Britain as a whole. Though arguably, that's a pretty low bar to clear.


*As someone with a particular love of dumb history, that Scotland lost its independence for 400+ years because.of an idiotic scheme to settle a murderous stretch of malarial swamp with Scots is hard to beat.
 
Whilst I agree they 1% is appalling and an insult to all those who have kept the country going for the last year, the 1% is a little over £500m not £82m.

Still peanuts to the amount the govt has wasted and given out and disgusting that the NHS has been treated this way.

The 1% is an insult to them especially after wasting of 37billion on track and trace and PPE orders that were no good.
Did read this morning that the nurses union may call for strike action......there hasn’t been a nurses strike since the 80s.
 
The 1% is an insult to them especially after wasting of 37billion on track and trace and PPE orders that were no good.
Did read this morning that the nurses union may call for strike action......there hasn’t been a nurses strike since the 80s.
100% with you.

So often in the last year we have called everyone of them heroes. Boris has even said they saved his life. All the government can find is a measly 1% to reward them. Absolute outrage IMO...probably the worst thing this government have done,
 
By offering only a 1% pay rise to NHS workers, the Government has allowed itself room to maybe up it to 2.5% in view of the public outcry and can then be seen as "listening" to the concerns of the public. Very manipulative of them.
They’re really not that clever.

I agree with both of you. They have done it to see if they can get away with it and depending on the outcry can up it a bit, whilst still paying less than they should.