Goon Garbage

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

There’s no contradiction there? Fluking your way to a trophy doesn’t mean they don’t count as much if you win it in the end. A trophy is a trophy.

He had one of the easiest runs a manager could dream of when he won the EL with Man Utd in 2017, but it didn’t matter in the end because he still won the damn thing and that’s what he’ll be remembered for. Not scraping past Celta Vigo, Rostov and Anderlecht.
 
You must log in or register to see media

I'm not singling out Arsenal for this, but the whole thing is a ****ing disgrace.
Nobody seems to be held responsible for reprehensible behaviour like this any more, as long as they've got enough money.

I have a work mate stuck in a flat with the cladding , can't afford the money to pay the landlord if they replace the cladding , unable to sell the place with the existing cladding which has dropped 25% in value since the cladding was identified , and ironically his flat has no cladding on it but the rest of the building does
 
You must log in or register to see media
You must log in or register to see media
The obsession continues - and makes them look like a bunch of ****s

Same goes for the Chav fans posting the same ****
I know they're probably all 12 and that means that the whole thing is before their time, but that's some real tasteless ****.
 
You must log in or register to see media

I'm not singling out Arsenal for this, but the whole thing is a ****ing disgrace.
Nobody seems to be held responsible for reprehensible behaviour like this any more, as long as they've got enough money.
One person needs to bring a case against one of the builders or architects of these substandard buildings. This could be crowd funded by all those living in such blighted flats as well as the general public. There appears to be clear evidence that this cladding was known to be flammable and was sourced because it was cheap. Is that not the basis of a case?
 
One person needs to bring a case against one of the builders or architects of these substandard buildings. This could be crowd funded by all those living in such blighted flats as well as the general public. There appears to be clear evidence that this cladding was known to be flammable and was sourced because it was cheap. Is that not the basis of a case?
Unfortunately it will depend if it met the then Building Control regs. I think it is likely they didn't, but it is a bit of a dark area.