... because footie never stops for some fanny rolling around like they've been shot ... aerosoling free kicks... goal celebrations
Ex pros Ian Wright - 'Aubameyang is clearly 3 yards offside, but it's against Spurs so **** it, let's say he was just on '
Hardly the same is it ? Rugby is a game that operates in a stop / start way, scrum downs, line outs etc. It's built into the rules of the game. Football is a free flowing game, or at least it's supposed to be.
Thanks Statto ... but the main point is how the technology is used; quickly, efficiently and invariably gets the correct outcome
Oh yeah that's the other thing I forgot to mention; ditch off the pitchside monitors. Why are they needed? We should only be using VAR for clear and obvious errors in which case you don't need the on pitch ref to have a look. If you have to say "Ooohhh, dunno about that one, you might wanna have another look" then it's quite clearly not clear and obvious. It should only really be used when you can take one look and go "Nope, you've got that wrong. Needs overturning"
No, the point is rugby is a far more of stop-start sport. It’s often not used quickly at all even with fewer subjective calls.
The technology only looks at trys and serious infringements ... the pattern of the game is somewhat irrelevant to that
I'm fully expecting VAR to give Liverpool 3 points this afternoon, just like it did last time we played.
Which is why it should be a separate body... The best bet would be to recruit officials from abroad for VAR.
I'm not sure, I think Salah may have hurt his vocal chords which means he's just not screaming loud enough at the right pitch. I'm going for a convenient application of an ambiguous rule.