Match Day Thread General matchday thread.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Jammy 07 said:
Would have loved the victory but we held our own against a good PL team.

Lots of positives and we go again on Friday <ok>
Click to expand...
I thought Wolves have been ordinary so far and you could have well been up at half time. You seemed to run out of ideas and Wolves played themselves back into it. It's still a massive learning curve for you and you must be happy with the start you've made. The bottom 3 already looks nailed on to be out of West Brom, Fulham, Sheff Utd and Burnley. You'll be fine and hopefully be able to kick on and consolidate after that. I think you've went up at just the right time, I can see new changes coming in which makes it harder for teams to stay up once they've been promoted meaning less change over of teams each season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gessa, Diego and Jammy 07
Big Ern said:
I see you missed out
  • Does the player show clear malice when making the challenge?
I wonder why you did that? Is it because Pickford onl;y had eyes on the ball and clearly wasn't being malicious and therefore makes your argument null and void?


Here are 2 examples of almost the same thing that resulted in Andy Carroll red cards.

1st example, serious foul play v Swansea, he goes up for the ball and elbows one of their players in the head, he had a quick look at where the player was first, so it wa serious foul play.
2. v Burnley, 2 yellows for recklessness, he does the same thing twice in a minute to what he did in the Swansea game, except he doesn't look first, so it's not serious foul play.

Do you understand now ****tard?

I suggest you go back to the crèche that is the Liverpool board and cry there.
Click to expand...

Wtf you ****ing about now? Just read the actual rules, not the ones you've made up, on the FAs own website regarding Rule 12 and serious foul play. Theres **** all about your three 'criterion ' :emoticon-0143-smirk, just the rules I quoted. All of which cover Prickford's action.

But he wasn't sent off. Boo-boo. That wasn't my ****ing beel. My beel is dicktards like you you pretending he wasn't sent off because he shouldn't have according to the rules. That's patent horseshit, and if you don't know it yet then everyone else reading your made up drivel does. Those with an iota of learning do anyway.
 
I'm just waiting for the muzzy and alcoholic bantz coming out then I'm off to sleep. Struggling to keep my eyes open here but I'm to much of a nosey **** to miss anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE, Spurlock and Sucky
Oh Saffy said:
I'm just waiting for the muzzy and alcoholic bantz coming out then I'm off to sleep. Struggling to keep my eyes open here but I'm to much of a nosey **** to miss anything.
Click to expand...
Think Spurlys just put comm to bed for the night with that last thunderfuckah of a post.
 
Donga Darko said:
Wtf you ****ing about now? Just read the actual rules, not the ones you've made up, on the FAs own website regarding Rule 12 and serious foul play. Theres **** all about your three 'criterion ' :emoticon-0143-smirk, just the rules I quoted. All of which cover Prickford's action.

But he wasn't sent off. Boo-boo. That wasn't my ****ing beel. My beel is dicktards like you you pretending he wasn't sent off because he shouldn't have according to the rules. That's patent horseshit, and if you don't know it yet then everyone else reading your made up drivel does. Those with an iota of learning do anyway.
Click to expand...
Describe serious foul play.
 
PJS - BACK AND BOSSING IT said:
like I said, no charge. Wasn’t a tackle with intent/malice.

You must log in or register to see images


Cheers.
Click to expand...

Okay, I'll be charitable. You weren't saying Prickford was going for the ball you were saying he lunged uncontrolled and recklessly into Virgil without any attempt whatsoever to get the ball. But there was no malice or intent involved. Do you know what? You're a ****ing idiot, but you qualify to work as a VAR ref. Well ****ing done. <cheers>
 
Donga Darko said:
Okay, I'll be charitable. You weren't saying Prickford was going for the ball you were saying he lunged uncontrolled and recklessly into Virgil without any attempt whatsoever to get the ball. But there was no malice or intent involved. Do you know what? You're a ****ing idiot, but you qualify to work as a VAR ref. Well ****ing done. <cheers>
Click to expand...
Prickford<laugh>, you really are damaged goods.
Your patter is weak
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tel (they/them) and Peej
Donga Darko said:
Okay, I'll be charitable. You weren't saying Prickford was going for the ball you were saying he lunged uncontrolled and recklessly into Virgil without any attempt whatsoever to get the ball. But there was no malice or intent involved. Do you know what? You're a ****ing idiot, but you qualify to work as a VAR ref. Well ****ing done. <cheers>
Click to expand...
Why tf do you think he was going for van Dyke?
there was no whistle for off side so i assume you think he just wanted to give away a penalty and get red carded <doh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back