Well I'd like to see that list! Biden has been a politician for nearly fifty years. He confiscated, lied and threatened over the Benghazi Clinton scandal for one thing, and he was known, as are they all, for being g casual with tbevtruth when it suited him, even I the Senate. But that is not the point,nor is it a surprise. The point is that there is a comical acceptance of a man clearly not well enough, mentally alert enugh, or suitable for office just because he isn't someone else. If Trump, say had said " I was able to stay isolated because a black woman filled up the shelves of tbe supermarket" , it would have been headline news on the day and thereafter here and everywhere. But Biden said this last week when he wasn't reading a teleprompter, and how many people know? How many know he yelled at a black man earlier in the year telling him," if you don't vote for me boy you ain't black" ? He later denied saying it despite it having been on TV. How many know of his very shady Ukraine connections and the favours afforded his son from that quarter? AGAIN, you don't have to like Trump to dislike Biden. He was a bad tempered man ten years ago according to reporters at the time, and he's worse now.
The problem is in the last sentence. Instead of putting up a candidate with a decent view of how they would approach things, a possibility earlier in tbe year, the negative approach inherent in the anyone but idea allows the selection of a man who is ageing very rapidly, with a terrifying inability to think on his feet, and who will almost certainly not last four years. So people are being asked a false question. It is a sad indictment of a system that it throws up two such men. And that people find it so hard to criticise them, because they are on their " side"
You cannot possibly know that...but say he dies or is deemed not fit to carry on....Still better then the psycho in there right now
Well it's very impressive I'm sure. And no doubt if the Post had the integrity it could por over every other politician and find other vast mountains of lies. But I think you are missing the point. I hold no flag for Trump. But I'm pointing out that Biden is to even his closest allies, clearly not fit to assume office. Just the sight of his wife having to hold his hand and coax him in TV interviews earlier in the year tells you that, without even getting into his multiple, and consistent displays confusion. This a very bad time for America, and it is part of a trend which was perhaps bound to reach here. The worst choice they have had to make since.......the last time.
No I cannot know it. But there is no one who thinks he will last. Perhaps not die, but prove to be woefully unable to meet the demands of the office, as he probably is now. Harris has been caught out on a hot microphone talking about a Harris presidency......." with Joe". She didn't take it back That's the problem. It is the ugly dishonesty of putting a man on a ticket and having to manage him like an invalid in the hope that no one notices. As for Trump being a psycho, well probably not quite . But the US constitution is remarkably robust, which is why it would be very difficult for anyone to name any serious change in the law enacted in his time, other than executive orders which can be rescinded without the House by any future President.
thats your opinion mate, tell me where you looked for evidence on which sites, or are you just saying that because you think it,i know you are left leaning,i have no qualms with you or your beliefs, but please use facts i can see to back your claims...........
If I make quotes then I will be able to source the evidence. If I put a personal opinion, I will make it clear that it is just that.
Ok. I'll bite. Here is a quote for you... Kari Baxter Donovan (the journalist who brought this entire thing to light...) "For the record, anyone following my #SEALTeam6 articles, I have no proof that the Whistleblower's claim are true, but I am suspicious, of course, I am. I also believe it should be investigated by people who are far smarter than I, and who are far more equipped to investigate." The bit where she says she has no proof is fascinating given how this conversation has gone. Really, really curious. Rog. You crazy.
you couldn't resist now look at the vid with the 4 eyewitness guys who actually were there. and thats why your words mean nothing try and pull the eye witness statements apart
I'm not watching that dumbledore impersonator again. I'll wait for someone more knowledgeable than you or I to deem it as fact. Nice one.
there are a few vids scroll down and look for the one with 4 guys, that's the proof and stop talking, without watching facts based videos, you ramble on assuming you know the truth yet what you talk about is only your opinion that you want and wish to be true,
This is getting silly. I DO NOT KNOW THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER. If you can tell me what my opinion is "that I want and wish to be true." I will be thunderstruck. You are filling in blanks that aren't there to be filled in. This entire thing has been about me saying the source provided lacks credibility. It isn't about me stating a hypothesis that counters what they say, I clearly couldn't do that because I don't know anything about the matter. It isn't political. Left not right. It is simply the fact that the materials provided are not credible. I would be saying the exact same thing if this was leftist conspiracy theory and propaganda. I just don't like unproven conspiracy theory painted as facts. It's pretty much brainwashing. And there isn't a time in human history where that's led to anything positive. You go on believing whatever it is you want to believe. But be prepared for anyone with a brain in their head to questions its legitimacy as fact. Nice one.
why are you here on this thread, if it's getting silly it's ,because you are trying your best to disrupt and turn it that way, you comment on things you haven't watched yet give opinions based on your left leaning tendencies.If you want to converse with me at least watch what im talking about so that you can give your perspective, this bullshit of i won't watch but will comment anyway you assume because you think, well i think your talking **** so if you cant or wont educate yourself to the other side of the argument then don't assume you are correct.
Agreed. I appreciate that and the same to you too mate. I've enjoyed it a lot. It's been an absolute pleasure. Especially the coherency of it all. I think we've both painted ourselves in a really good light. And I just hope the rest of the forum take the time to learn from us. God bless.
yet no mention of the democrat 3 and a half years of lies, at a cost of over 40 mil on Russian collusion which they said they had evidence of yet all proven false and it all started by a dossier paid for by the Clinton Foundation involving sacked ex part time British spy Steel , all to get rid of Trump incase he finds out how dirty the deep state really is, with the Biden scandals these are the real lies, but the democrat backing news wants half truths and innuendo that left leaners will jump on and lap up, one day they may wake up and find they have deen lied to
