Or. They couldn’t stop it because U.K. law will supersede the wishes of a corrupt cartel. I think it’s been blown out of proportion tbh.
Your owners are happy to take £40m a season in sponsorship off a bank that moves money around to fund terrorism so I highly doubt they give a **** about the morals of the Saudis. What they wouldn't like is the possibility of another team competing, look at how emotional you all get about City. That's all the veto is aimed that, to ensure nobody could ever threaten the top clubs again. As if FFP wasn't anti-competitive enough.
And Stalin. And Pol Pot. You can't just have Hitler on his own if you're keeping things in perspective.
Trying to take control of things that don't belong to you, an abuse of power and a belief its for the greater good. I'll leave this here A good day to you sir
So just let the clubs who haven't been successful enough collapse like any other business. Is that competitive enough?
You can do that without wanting special voting rights. One doesn't have to come with the other. Convenient you completely ignored the other part of my post btw.
Been so long I've almost forgotten about creepy Stan. Gave Tobes the keys to the vault and skipped Town after pm ban gate I bet he still reads here though. Yo @Stan you drippy ****
So they didn't furlough the staff then? Btw, were Liverpool evil for allowing their staff to avail themselves of NHS facilities during the pandemic when they could have paid for it all privately themselves? Or are they just evil because they're just evil?
Idi Amin, Ivan the Terrible and Mao would be granted special status in the plans, along with the so-called 'big six'.
I ignored the part where you tried to compare a sponsorship contract signed years ago with a multinational company which has faced recent allegations to the case of a dictator saying "I take responsibility for the brutal murder of a journalist who criticised me" one week and then "I feel a deep connection to the working class city of Newcastle" the next.
