Match Day Thread Fleetwood v Hull City

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

City win

  • Total voters
    72
  • Poll closed .
Just seen the goals & although Batty was the player chasing back, he was well beaten for pace, even though the Fleetwood player had a start on him, even at full speed he was losing ground. Ingram should have done a bit better really too.
As for our goal, a couple of lucky deflections ended it into Honeyman’s path.
 
Howdentiger2 said:
I've never said we are dominating teams or that we have any devine right to, but if he wants to negative constantly then what's wrong with me being positive? Or are people not allowed to be on here? He isn't telling the truth though...we haven't by any stretch looked poor at the back all season so far
Click to expand...

I ain't negative constantly though. Have you not seen my almost concerning adoration for Honeyman? And offensively we've looked great so far this season. Our midfield is much better than it has been in ages.



That doesn't mean our defence hasn't been poor though. Which it has.
 
GLP said:
Much kudos to him. He’d be the first name on my team sheet. He’s been superb.
Click to expand...

Champ possibly a step to far for him? or maybe the bad apples of last season just had to much of a negative influence over those around them.... Hopefully we get the chance to see next season
 
Howdentiger2 said:
I've never said we are dominating teams or that we have any devine right to, but if he wants to negative constantly then what's wrong with me being positive? Or are people not allowed to be on here? He isn't telling the truth though...we haven't by any stretch looked poor at the back all season so far
Click to expand...

He isn't being negative constantly though, he's just pointing out stuff he sees. He's not going to make stuff up to make us sound good, is he?

There's nothing wrong with being positive when there's scope to do so, but just doing it for the sake of it and then complaining at others for not doing likewise isn't really on.

I don't think we've looked particularly good (not bad, just meh). I think it's been more down to the opposition being of a worse standard that we haven't conceded. Against Championship sides we'd be run ragged.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Quill
Tentotwo said:
Closing us down mate.

Need to keep the ball better..
Click to expand...
Its more when they have the ball, they are running at our back four, with our midfield fairly non existent. Similar story to post lockdown last season. Guess it's Grant's way., fine if we have the ball. It's entertaining but I'm not sure it's a set up that will win us promotion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dennisboothstash
No ****ing nails left, felt nervous long before the whistle... klp is going to be one hell of a player, if we could get him into more one on ones he’ll absolutely skin that right back. For the disallowed goal he took it down brilliantly, a cpl of touches and bang, top right hand corner. An absolute crime that was chalked off...
 
Not impressed with Wilks hold up play so far, lacking is normal touch also could have give a penalty away. Keeper decent save on one occasion however flapped at a cross then poor for their goal. Batty out paced, Second half improvements needed, must use the ball better and get our very decent wingers involved. Overall to go on and win this a 20% improvement all over the pitch is needed. Come on city
 
  • Like
Reactions: pudseytiger
If anything...please don't let them score again just so we don't have to listen to that goal music !
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back