Trump Dead!

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Hoddle is a god said:
Yeah, there are drugs that “assist” some conditions, but the side affects are not nice.
Click to expand...

So on the one hand you try and assert that ‘millions’ in the U.K. will die as a direct result of the 3 month lockdown, as they won’t have been routinely diagnosed and therefore had chemo, radiotherapy, immunotherapy etc as early as they would have ordinarily have done.

Then on the next breath you’re trying to suggest that the drugs they didn’t have early access to merely ‘assist’ and highlight their side effects.

You’re all over the place ffs, largely because your argument is full of hyperbole and short on actual fact & you’ve ended up with a confused and contradictory position, as per.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE, DerekTheMole, pompeymeowth and 2 others
aberdude said:
Not new news to me but I hope Tobes looks at it...... See no evil hear no evil.

Good post brb
Click to expand...

I think it's a catch 22 situation for pharmaceuticals. They don't purposely set out to harm you, but when things do go wrong, people want someone to blame. Blame then results in compensation, I can see both sides of a dispute. We expect people to make us better, but want to blame them when it goes wrong, damned if you do and damned if you don't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
aberdude said:
Not new news to me but I hope Tobes looks at it...... See no evil hear no evil.

Good post brb
Click to expand...
Some of us aren’t binary brained morons ffs.

Big Pharma - especially US pharma, are largely profiteering twats. However that doesn’t mean that they don’t actually produce some fantastic life saving or life extending drugs.

Testing regimes have moved on somewhat since the 60’s btw. New cancer drugs for example, have to go through 5 year human trials before being certified. Does that mean that there can never be issues with certified drugs in the future? No, as long term effects can never be ruled out, however much they try. Unless you literally had drugs on a human lifespan testing regime before release.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DerekTheMole, Peej and brb
Tobes said:
Some of us aren’t binary brained morons ffs.

Big Pharma - especially US pharma, are largely profiteering twats. However that doesn’t mean that they don’t actually produce some fantastic life saving or life extending drugs.

Testing regimes have moved on somewhat since the 60’s btw. New cancer drugs for example, have to go through 5 year human trials before being certified. Does that mean that there can never be issues with certified drugs in the future? No, as long term effects can never be ruled out, however much they try. Unless you literally had drugs on a human lifespan testing regime before release.
Click to expand...


Maybe Just take ginger and hot water. That Way you( anti pharmaceutical) don’t fuel the big pharma system and in later life Are not helped and put no strain on the social welfare/healthcare system.

or just take what you cherry pick as assistance from big pharma, god these idiots have got me!
 
PJS - BACK AND BOSSING IT said:
didn't want to point that out at the time
But got your point.
Click to expand...

I think a lot of the lads have got use to me now....writing stuff like...'watching paint drive' <laugh>

Majority of my posts I have to edit, what I think and what I write are two completely different things, it also affects when I read stuff, so often I will misinterpret stuff that has been written.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back