You must log in or register to see images
You’d hope they wouldn’t be too down.
Whether we like it or not a PL team comfortably beating a League 1 team in a cup game when the L1 team didn’t play their full first team is hardly newsworthy.
On the decision to play to be fair to GM I’m struggling to see why he should have had to make a decision. I thought the Govt guidance would have meant West Ham had to have their players isolating for at least a few days until they’d all tested positive so he shouldn’t have even been put in that position. It says that if you have had contact in the last 2 days, and it talks about how close, if it’s physical contact etc and also says contact includes travelling near someone who has tested positive, then you need to isolate. Can’t see how other players, although maybe not all I suppose, wouldn’t have been classed as being in contact with the 3 who are positive so also should have gone home too?
https://www.gov.uk/government/publi...-19-infection-who-do-not-live-with-the-person
Those are the criteria that schools, offices, shops etc are having to apply every day. There are very clear and straightforward and not open to interpretation.
I agree that McCann shouldn't have had to make a decision on the hoof last night. However he is responsible as part of the management team for not having a clear policy and set of protocols drawn up for such an eventuality.
It's not like anyone in the club's management structure couldn't see that this situation might arise.
It was entirely predictable.
Indeed, it will happen again.
They've been studying at the Dido Harding School of Leadership, I guess.