New owners

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I sort of see what you mean, but it's really screwing with fan solidarity. The new guy running ITTV terrible syrup is just stopping all debate regarding Southall, and his 2 wimp moderators are saluting. It was a good read a month ago, it's now just a load of silly kids talking about twitter hits.
Terrible Syrup knows quite a bit on the inside of the guys under the umbrella of F4F. His info is solid enough to contest a lot being said. Mike Bassett and SquareBall are apologists of the highest order, he is putting them and others right.

I disagree strongly with the term wimps, the Moderators over there appear grateful for his contribution.

We cannot please everybody.
 
Terrible Syrup knows quite a bit on the inside of the guys under the umbrella of F4F. His info is solid enough to contest a lot being said. Mike Bassett and SquareBall are apologists of the highest order, he is putting them and others right.

I disagree strongly with the term wimps, the Moderators over there appear grateful for his contribution.

We cannot please everybody.

Agreed, and I will never post on there, but it is interesting going through members posts. I have a lot of time on my hands.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElfsborgAddick
Terrible syrup (one of our saviours) posted on ITTV that he had all the goss on Southall in January, meaning that Henry Irving is a bit late to the party. Questions to be answered are.

1. Did Dodger and NLA also have this information? Terrible syrups post: “Dodger released the Bassini documents back in January, & some claimed that they were fake then” Yes Dodger did know!

2. If they did, why the hell didn't they expose Southall straight away.

Did they keep this season saving information as some kind of power trip?

I can only imagine how the atmosphere at the club would have changed for the better with Southall caught with his pants down. How different would the club vibe have been. How pumped up would the fans have been. Would the team have played better, would we have stayed up?

In addition, we wouldn't have all this mess with ESI 2.

Charlton heroes? I'll let you decide that one.

Thanks terrible syrup for shafting your own fans for twitter hits.
 
Last edited:
Hi there Sandman.

My name is Lardiman - has always been that, whatever forum I've posted on.
You know Elfs of course, and Royston (terrible syrup at present, but makes no secret of who he is).
You're probably familiar with everyone else on this forum too.

Who are you?

My guess would be either IncorruptibleAddick or Major - though Elfs believes them to be one and the same.

You're obviously not a newbie on forums, even though you've only been posting here for just under two weeks.
And you have a clear agenda/grudge against Royston (though I admit that clue doesn't narrow down the field much <whistle>).

Don't think you're PL54 as he's been on here recently.

Any thoughts gentlemen?
Or do we already know who Sandman is, and I just missed that conversation...
 
Terrible syrup (one of our saviours) posted on ITTV that he had all the goss on Southall in January, meaning that Henry Irving is a bit late to the party. Questions to be answered are.

1. Did Dodger and NLA also have this information? Terrible syrups post: “Dodger released the Bassini documents back in January, & some claimed that they were fake then” Yes Dodger did know!

2. If they did, why the hell didn't they expose Southall straight away.

Did they keep this season saving information as some kind of power trip?

I can only imagine how the atmosphere at the club would have changed for the better with Southall caught with his pants down. How different would the club vibe have been. How pumped up would the fans have been. Would the team have played better, would we have stayed up?

In addition, we wouldn't have all this mess with ESI 2.

Charlton heroes? I'll let you decide that one.

Thanks terrible syrup for shafting your own fans for twitter hits.
Laughable.

Another apologist.
 
Hi there Sandman.

My name is Lardiman - has always been that, whatever forum I've posted on.
You know Elfs of course, and Royston (terrible syrup at present, but makes no secret of who he is).
You're probably familiar with everyone else on this forum too.

Who are you?

My guess would be either IncorruptibleAddick or Major - though Elfs believes them to be one and the same.

You're obviously not a newbie on forums, even though you've only been posting here for just under two weeks.
And you have a clear agenda/grudge against Royston (though I admit that clue doesn't narrow down the field much <whistle>).

Don't think you're PL54 as he's been on here recently.

Any thoughts gentlemen?
Or do we already know who Sandman is, and I just missed that conversation...
This post is classic Williamson. I cannot see it being Patsy, he only posts one liners.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lardiman
@Sandman, Williamson, you don't support Charlton. You could not give a f*** if we folded.

Stick to the gin and tonics watching Kent down at Canterbury, SE7 does not need the likes of you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smudger603