Shame you don't read, what you preach...
Professor Glover: I should put my cards on the table I am not a religious believer. I am actually not a typical subscriber to the principle of sanctity of life either, but I think that it is one value that I very well understand the pull of without it being a matter of it being commanded by God.
What I understand the secular version to be is identical to what I understand the religious version to be— namely, that there is an absolute barrier, an absolute ban, not derived from a religious source, on the intentional taking of innocent human life.
It is the same principle, and if it seems a puzzle why someone who does not believe it is God who says "Thou shalt not kill" should take that view, perhaps I could mention George Orwell—and this links back to capital punishment. George Orwell describes how, when he was in the colonial service, somewhere in the Far East—I forget exactly where but possibly Burma—he was once part of a group of men who were present at an execution.
He describes walking towards the place of the execution, the group of the guards, the officials and so on, and in the middle was the man who was to be executed. As they walked along the path there was a puddle and everybody, including the man who was about to be executed, swerved to avoid the puddle.
At that moment George Orwell suddenly had this very powerful intuitive response. He said that here we were, a group of men, walking along together, and all of our bodies were toiling away as they usually do—hearts were working, brains were working, it was all working—but in a few moments there would be one of these people less— "One life less, one world less", he said. "At that moment it came to me", as he put it, "the unspeakable wrongness of cutting off a life in full tide."
Good find.... Means little though and purely his opinion.

