Has anybody ever made one or have experience with them, or if not, can point me in the direction of an expert?
I'm a bit stuck with mine.
My grandad passed away a year and a bit ago and something always stuck with me that he told me when I was a kid. He told me about the time he enlisted in the army and wanted to join the Scottish regiment because he knew older generations of the family had been in that regiment and was adamant that the family originated from Scotland (my mum and my uncle have both since told me he told them about the same Scotland theory too).
I got a load of old paperwork from my grandad's sister - a large proportion was about my grandad's grandad (my great-great grandad?) and there was a family tree that another family member had tried to piece together about a decade or so ago.
What caught my eye and made me question the, what's the best word? Backstory? back-link? of the family tree (basically everyone that had come before him) was that they all were born, lived and died in Whitehaven, Cumbria. Not Scotland.
My grandad's grandad's records read like perhaps two people with the same name have had their records mixed together.
All his files on Ancestry seem to look that way two.
One set of records states:
Born: Whitehaven 1872
Married: Hull 1909
Died: Carlisle 1976
(why would he have died in Carlisle, when his wife and children all lived and remained in East Yorkshire?
More odd is that he outlived most of his children too, and Ancestry says he lived until he was 96, even though the dates show 104 - so by the age, they believe he was born 1879?)
Another set of records (including his WWI Navy records) states:
Born: Hull 1879
Married: Hull 1909
Died: Carlisle 1976
(My grandad's sister told me her grandma (his wife) had told her that he fell overboard and died at sea some time between the first and second world wars)
Can you see now why I think maybe two records of two people with the same name may have been mixed up? Especially as there are no links back to Scotland with the Whitehaven records - when you click on the Born in Hull records, the family tree reverts to the Whitehaven one - but it can't be the same man, as he's signed records (Navy records and marriage certificate among other things stating born in Hull in 1879. If that is the case, why would all the rest of his family be born, raised and died in Whitehaven? Also, it states his "father" died in 1876 - so if he was born in Hull in 1879, not only is it a completely different place to the rest of his family, it's also three years after his dad died!! impossible!
I've tried working it out/looking for more clues, but getting nowhere - I need someone like on those programmes on that BBC show which helps celebrities trace their ancestors.
Thanks if anyone can help!
I'm a bit stuck with mine.
My grandad passed away a year and a bit ago and something always stuck with me that he told me when I was a kid. He told me about the time he enlisted in the army and wanted to join the Scottish regiment because he knew older generations of the family had been in that regiment and was adamant that the family originated from Scotland (my mum and my uncle have both since told me he told them about the same Scotland theory too).
I got a load of old paperwork from my grandad's sister - a large proportion was about my grandad's grandad (my great-great grandad?) and there was a family tree that another family member had tried to piece together about a decade or so ago.
What caught my eye and made me question the, what's the best word? Backstory? back-link? of the family tree (basically everyone that had come before him) was that they all were born, lived and died in Whitehaven, Cumbria. Not Scotland.
My grandad's grandad's records read like perhaps two people with the same name have had their records mixed together.
All his files on Ancestry seem to look that way two.
One set of records states:
Born: Whitehaven 1872
Married: Hull 1909
Died: Carlisle 1976
(why would he have died in Carlisle, when his wife and children all lived and remained in East Yorkshire?
More odd is that he outlived most of his children too, and Ancestry says he lived until he was 96, even though the dates show 104 - so by the age, they believe he was born 1879?)
Another set of records (including his WWI Navy records) states:
Born: Hull 1879
Married: Hull 1909
Died: Carlisle 1976
(My grandad's sister told me her grandma (his wife) had told her that he fell overboard and died at sea some time between the first and second world wars)
Can you see now why I think maybe two records of two people with the same name may have been mixed up? Especially as there are no links back to Scotland with the Whitehaven records - when you click on the Born in Hull records, the family tree reverts to the Whitehaven one - but it can't be the same man, as he's signed records (Navy records and marriage certificate among other things stating born in Hull in 1879. If that is the case, why would all the rest of his family be born, raised and died in Whitehaven? Also, it states his "father" died in 1876 - so if he was born in Hull in 1879, not only is it a completely different place to the rest of his family, it's also three years after his dad died!! impossible!
I've tried working it out/looking for more clues, but getting nowhere - I need someone like on those programmes on that BBC show which helps celebrities trace their ancestors.
Thanks if anyone can help!