Well well who would’ve thought it, can’t afford to play games but
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/53475241
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/53475241
Oxford
- Thread starter Comfy
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Any team that refuses to play due to financial reasons should be given a transfer embargo to ensure they "don't spend beyond their means"
The EFL needed some sort of requital for those that voted to end the season. But they are too thick and bent to realise that clubs would vote for league position as opposed to whether they could afford to play on or not
Lets not forget, we have since found out that clubs were then funded in the play offs.
The end of season debacle was sickening, as was the start of same, these administrators are not fit for purpose, and keep on proving it.
We have no scouts, Phil Parkinson is on Fifa every day searching
There was a link on the SMB but can’t find it. That said, 4 league one clubs had players tested the day before the vote, just the 4, so the result was already known. Surely those clubs who said it wasn’t economically viable would fork out for tests and have no income? So we have two options, the EFL funded those tests, or the clubs did find it economically viable to continue. Either way it was a ****ing farce