Coronavirus

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Boris...

  • should completely lock us down immediately and fook up all our Christmas'

    Votes: 3 12.5%

  • let the bodies stack high

    Votes: 13 54.2%

  • lock us down from the 29th to fook up Treble's plans

    Votes: 8 33.3%
  • Total voters
    24
Status
Not open for further replies.
Tobes said:
The number of worldwide infections per day hit a new peak yesterday at over 250,000.

This is just too easy. I’m embarrassed for you I really am.
Click to expand...

I’m no longer going to debate this issue with you, as you clearly lack the ability to see what is staring you in the face.
 
Hoddle is a god said:
No way you have read the links that I posted.

I’m no longer going to debate this issue with you, as you clearly lack the ability to see what is staring you in the face.
Click to expand...

Literally pulled out a post from one of your links that clearly outlines the efficacy of wearing masks

"Standard N95 mask performance was used as a control to compare the results with cloth masks, and our results suggest that cloth masks are only marginally beneficial in protecting individuals from particles<2.5 μm. Compared with cloth masks, disposable surgical masks are more effective in reducing particulate exposure"

One thing you are right about though is that you're probably best not debating this issue, because you are **** at it <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes and DerekTheMole
PISKIE said:
Literally pulled out a post from one of your links that clearly outlines the efficacy of wearing masks

"Standard N95 mask performance was used as a control to compare the results with cloth masks, and our results suggest that cloth masks are only marginally beneficial in protecting individuals from particles<2.5 μm. Compared with cloth masks, disposable surgical masks are more effective in reducing particulate exposure"

One thing you are right about though is that you're probably best not debating this issue, because you are **** at it <ok>
Click to expand...

I was going to come back to that same link when I had time. Love it when his own posts ****s all over his arguments. Happens every time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gooner4ever, Tobes and PINKIE
Libby said:
Hope there's not another century wait for the next one.

It's coming home, it's coming home, it's coming, Covid's coming home!
Click to expand...

I’m no longer going to debate this issue with you, as you clearly lack the ability to see what is staring you in the face.
 
Hoddle is a god said:
I’m no longer going to debate this issue with you, as you clearly lack the ability to see what is staring you in the face.
Click to expand...

From another one of the links you posted :

"Surgical face masks significantly reduced detection of influenza virus RNA in respiratory droplets and coronavirus RNA in aerosols, with a trend toward reduced detection of coronavirus RNA in respiratory droplets. Our results indicate that surgical face masks could prevent transmission of human coronaviruses and influenza viruses from symptomatic individuals."

You've literally contradicted yourself with your own links, that takes some special kind of **** up mate <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: pompeymeowth, remembercolinlee, Solid Air and 2 others
PISKIE said:
From another one of the links you posted :

"Surgical face masks significantly reduced detection of influenza virus RNA in respiratory droplets and coronavirus RNA in aerosols, with a trend toward reduced detection of coronavirus RNA in respiratory droplets. Our results indicate that surgical face masks could prevent transmission of human coronaviruses and influenza viruses from symptomatic individuals."

You've literally contradicted yourself with your own links, that takes some special kind of **** up mate <laugh>
Click to expand...

:emoticon-0140-rofl:
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
Hoddle is a god said:
Even if you accept the numbers attributed to coronavirus, the problem for the pandemic fanboys is that the numbers being infected have slowed drastically and even stopped in some countries.

This is why the Government propaganda has been talking up a so-called second spike, since the very outbreak of this plandemic.
Click to expand...

Just to absolutely hammer this home. Here’s ^ HIAG’s claim.

Meanwhile, the actual reality is, that Worldwide infections reached a new peak literally yesterday, at over 250,000 new infections in a single day.

Fanboys though.......quite how do you end up in a place where people refusing to cry their eyes out over being told to wear a mask in a shop, are somehow ‘fans’ of a pandemic is literally beyond me, but hey ho.
 
  • Like
Reactions: remembercolinlee, PINKIE and DerekTheMole
Tobes said:
Just to absolutely hammer this home. Here’s ^ HIAG’s claim.

Meanwhile, the actual reality is, that Worldwide infections reached a new peak literally yesterday, at over 250,000 new infections in a single day.

Fanboys though.......quite how do you end up in a place where people refusing to cry their eyes out over being told to wear a mask in a shop, are somehow ‘fans’ of a pandemic is literally beyond me, but hey ho.
Click to expand...

I’m no longer going to debate this issue with you, as you clearly lack the ability to see what is staring you in the face.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back