Jose Mourinho: Spurs 'not in same world' in transfer mark
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/53099812
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/53099812
The same rules apply to all, so I’m failing to see the actual point.Liverpool facing new Premier League threat after major UEFA decision
UEFA have made a decision that could impact Liverpool in the Premier League next season
https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/spo.../liverpool-facing-new-premier-league-18443900
But the Echo is a LFC shill paper so naturally they only care about LFCThe same rules apply to all, so I’m failing to see the actual point.
But the Echo is a LFC shill paper so naturally they only care about LFC
Of course!Obvs, but it’s like an admission that they’re skint, and they’re crying about something that is nothing but paranoia i.e. assuming that ‘dem oil clubz’ will use the relaxation in FFP for COVID to massively invest in players.
I think the article is about buying power, Liverpool cannot spend big without selling, whereas Chelsea are spending big without selling with the help of their oil baron. Apart from that , Liverpool are operating on going concern basis,Of course!
They will need an excuse at the ready should they turn out to be unsuccessful in continuing their success beyond the rest of this season.
Because Liverpool only ever lose because of anti LFC conspiracies....come on Tobes you should know all this![]()
Only, Chelsea have been self sustaining for 6 years, so the idea that they’re still the plaything of an oil baron is demonstrable nonsense.I think the article is about buying power, Liverpool cannot spend big without selling, whereas Chelsea are spending big without selling with the help of their oil baron. Apart from that , Liverpool are operating on going concern basis,
You’re racking up losses greater than ours as you’re losing much more revenue per lost home game, which helps pay your huge wage bill.The likes of Liverpool, Tottenham and arsenal will only spend within their means, which is the whole point of ffp. Ultimately it won't effect them in the long term, but smaller clubs like Burnley, Bournemouth, Everton and co could really struggle down the line.
But the Echo is a LFC shill paper so naturally they only care about LFC
TBF I think the Echo just aren't taking for granted that Everton will be in the Premier League next season

You’re racking up losses greater than ours as you’re losing much more revenue per lost home game, which helps pay your huge wage bill.
So no, not really.
Of which less than £30m was an operating loss, and we’ve covered that off with the £30m from USM for naming rights.Before the pandemic you'd just reported a club record £112m loss

which is why you aren't worried about a relaxation in FFP rules as EFC are already pushing the boundaries of whats allowed .Of which less than £30m was an operating loss, and we’ve covered that off with the £30m from USM for naming rights.
Meanwhile LFC are refunding STH’s weekly, on the drip ffs![]()
which is why you aren't worried about a relaxation in FFP rules as EFC are already pushing the boundaries of whats allowed .
There is no pointThe same rules apply to all, so I’m failing to see the actual point.

your spelling is frankly dreadful .Hang on I thought Moshiri was a [HASHTAG]#fraud[/HASHTAG]?
The likes of Liverpool, Tottenham and arsenal will only spend within their means, which is the whole point of ffp. Ultimately it won't effect them in the long term, but smaller clubs like Burnley, Bournemouth, Everton and co could really struggle down the line.
No the whole point of FFP is to protect the big clubs and ensure that nobody can really challenge them long term.
Absolute joke of a rule.