I have to say that I find it profoundly depressing that some on here who have no difficulty in finding right wing outrage to share with us seem unable or unwilling to declare themselves by answering Bob's question.
I have to say that I find it profoundly depressing that some on here who have no difficulty in finding right wing outrage to share with us seem unable or unwilling to declare themselves by answering Bob's question.
You must log in or register to see media
Respect !
Should have been on the front page of every newspaper, says far more than any picture of the Neanderthals...
Saying that I think I might of misread Daves original post. I assumed he was talking about the protests as a whole (including last weeks)
No, not the whole protest, just the group strutting through the park and being aggressive towards the picnicers.
I have to say that I find it profoundly depressing that some on here who have no difficulty in finding right wing outrage to share with us seem unable or unwilling to declare themselves by answering Bob's question.
Was he just walking through? The video I saw didnt show how that started.Yes mate, noted.
On the other hand though, I wouldn’t of wanted to of been a bald, white fella (like me) who just happened to be walking through Waterloo station yesterday afternoon/evening.
Was he just walking through? The video I saw didnt show how that started.
I imagine there one or two hidden away mateI haven't answered but that's because you would have to be unbelievably thick to say not blm. Its an obvious answer and not worth the effort. Might as well ask would you rather be dead or alive. Now the few suicidal might answer dead but its a given everyone wants to be alive. I don't think anyone is a thick dumb racist on here to be answering to white far right groups
Well that's alright then. She missed the opportunity to tell us all how it was the fault of the state that there are no public loos open or to explain why given his heroic civic cause to protect statues, he managed to get so pissed with no pubs open that he was unable to heed the cries of his fellow patriots who were telling him "No. Not there." I wonder if we had a variant of an 'eye for an eye' which would meet with general approval. 'Piss near a monument for a hero and you lose your willy.'
I imagine there one or two hidden away mate
I imagine there one or two hidden away mate
I mean there maybe 1 or 2 who would answer that they would choose to march with the far right group over the BLM movementName names Bob......I’ve met some proper paid up Nazis and fascists in my time.....and I’m pretty certain there ain’t any on here. Right wingers for sure.....racists, don’t buy it.
I was only teasing Ellers with the Abbot/racist thing![]()
Who knows? Enough dont mind being caught on tv so who knows mate. It sure explains why there is such thing as the BLM movement thoughYeah but are they really going to put in writing that they are actually nazis
I mean there maybe 1 or 2 who would answer that they would choose to march with the far right group over the BLM movement
AgreedAh ok.....but to generalise and say all the football lads who went yesterday were ‘far right’ is a bit of a red herring, imho. Of course there were elements there, like that **** Golding and his ilk...as well as the casual racists who are happy to use the word N***** as an insult. However they weren’t all ‘far right’ I’m sure.
A bit like saying all the BLM supporters were ‘far left’........I’m just trying to keep some kind of sensibility here and trying to avoid generalisation.
I can agree with that. I assumed that nobody on this thread would side with the cause of racism over that of BLM. It is as Bobby said an obvious answer. But it really was not a difficult question to answer. Strip out the violence on both sides which do you sympathise with. Given that hypothetical fact, there is no good reason for silence. That is not an issue of questioning their reasons but rather the fact that some would draw an inference from a refusal to answer. Which might be inaccurate and unfair.To be fair.....it’s up to the individual if they answer or not. Who are you or I to question their reasons.
Just saying
I can agree with that. I assumed that nobody on this thread would side with the cause of racism over that of BLM. It is as Bobby said an obvious answer. But it really was not a difficult question to answer. Strip out the violence on both sides which do you sympathise with. Given that hypothetical fact, there is no good reason for silence. That is not an issue of questioning their reasons but rather the fact that some would draw an inference from a refusal to answer. Which might be inaccurate and unfair.