erm he said
quote
"It was an accident which the parents have covered"
option 1
Off Topic Madeleine McCann
- Thread starter Albert's Chip Shop
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
erm he said
quote
"It was an accident which the parents have covered"
option 1
What proof do you have, none, same as me. both points of view are based on opinion, not fact.
Yes, possibly with the help of the bloke that supplied the drugs used to sedate her. Shops have cameras and also methods of tracking who purchased what. If you were in teh medical profession, woudl you buy sedatives OTC that you used to put to sleep a child that didn't allow you your well earned adult time.
That poor abandoned child(ren)
I'll ask again though
Based in what we know what is the most likley scenario as to what happened at that hotel
1. the parents killed her or some other unlikely scenario based on option 2
2.the convicted child rapist that has been linked to 3 missing children as he was in the area and burgled hotel rooms and low and behold changed car ownership the day after the abduction and he told people he knows she's dead
Based in what we know what is the most likley scenario as to what happened at that hotel
1. the parents killed her or some other unlikely scenario based on option 2
2.the convicted child rapist that has been linked to 3 missing children as he was in the area and burgled hotel rooms and low and behold changed car ownership the day after the abduction and he told people he knows she's dead
your choice is option 1 you vegetable
option one was
1. the parents killed her
I'm certainly poirot in comparison to you on the evidence of this mate
Sorry I view things a little differently. There's killing someone and then there's killing someone. Both have the same outcome but it's why there is a difference between murder and manslaugher, pre-meditated and accidental....the detail is quite important!
I'll ask again though
Based in what we know what is the most likley scenario as to what happened at that hotel
1. the parents killed her or some other weird far out explanationof which we have no sufficient evidence of
2.the convicted child rapist that has been linked to 3 missing children as he was in the area and burgled hotel rooms and low and behold changed car ownership the day after the abduction and he told people he knows she's dead
not on the question it doesn't.. I've kept it simple for a reason .
the detail isn't in because it doesn't matter
You are being led by your bias, it’s a common thing and something you can learn to spot and avoid in yourself.
Look at Kepner/Tregoe methods. They will stop you being led towards what you want, to what it is.
I'm giving you an option .
you have chosen 1 that's fine you've been on option 1 for years, so I would argue that you're being lead by yours..
just to be clear I don't care who it was
this question was straight fwd, so the fact you've all tapped danced around answering it or pretended you didn't understand it suggests to me that you're all being insincere as to your concerns
What is your proof that this guy did it?
you have none, it’s all hearsay. I don’t care what he did before, you have to have evidence he did this. You have as much as I do, it’s opinion based and not grounded in fact.
hence the question I highlighted
most likley
Why though didn't you apply the same caution in relation to your own or other accusations towards to parents for 13 years or even atvthe start of this very thread?
it seems strange it's only come in to question after the latest revelation involving Christian b
and ? not sure why that's relevant to the question
if I'd added all the possibilities under 1 and 2 it make a no difference.
there's a reason people are tap dancing around the answer.
1. is anything other than option 2 being responsible
What proof do you have this guy did it?
Same I have that the parents did, you are being led by your bias. What made you switch to this suspect, led by the media?
I think I've made myself clear mate .
you've finally picked 1
thankyou
is it ok for me to go with 2 without being told I have no evidence? if you look through this entire thread I've never once asked you or others to prove your choice absolutely nor did I say they are innocent till proven guilty.. that's what you lot have been doing not me.
what made me switch? I've never switched..
but erm what he's been convicted of, where he was and what he did .. plus his links to 2 other missing children that he happened to be near at the time...thats why I'm on him
what looks most likely now?
Christian B was named as the prime suspect in Madeleine's disappearance this week with prosecutors in Germany investigating him "on suspicion of murder".
German cops have sensationally revealed they believe Madeleine is dead and know how she was killed - despite no body being found.
Christian B was named as the prime suspect in Madeleine's disappearance this week with prosecutors in Germany investigating him "on suspicion of murder".
German cops have sensationally revealed they believe Madeleine is dead and know how she was killed - despite no body being found.
Last edited:
are you going to apologise to me yet or wait until even my fish figures this one out?
well Poirot?
Apologise for what? I've done nothing wrong!
If you mean agree with you and that you're right....then no.
no mate just taking the piss
surely you've figured it out now though
Christian B was named as the prime suspect in Madeleine's disappearance this week with prosecutors in Germany investigating him "on suspicion of murder".
German cops have sensationally revealed they believe Madeleine is dead and know how she was killed - despite nobody being found.
Last edited: