There's several possibilities. 1 could be that they're both guilty or it could just not be linked to either parties.
ok
1..any other weird and unlikely scenario given the details of option 2.
There's several possibilities. 1 could be that they're both guilty or it could just not be linked to either parties.
CC, You are going to wear your fingers down typing before you get the McCann haters to admit they were wrong. We will be getting alien abduction theories before it was the Nazi **** wot dun it.
Investigations don't proceed like that, they ensure that a case is watertight before charging. They will be interviewing all those who have zwei pfennigs worth to contribute first. I am quite confident that they will get there.
Portuguese police have again insisted that he isn't responsible. Says he was thoroughly investigated 4 years ago. They say this is nothing more than trying to put the case back in the public eye.
strange given the reports today are that the man told barstaff she's dead and it's a good thing.
I've come to realise your info is as accurate as indykalia
the other 3 police forces think it's him.
not seen any reports as you are claiming... Twitter?? agendas I think.
nonetheless the more you keep this up the worse you'll look .
fake news now... a new low
If that's what the police use as a basis for arresting people then i'm surprised that millions of other people haven't been arrested....me included. I've said the same thing to my mrs numerous times, as has she to me.
it's not though is it.
it's the other reasons .
Rafman has reported fake news
and it's because he's more interested in not being wrong and clearing a convicted child rapist than accepting what's likely.
Is he not already in prison for said crimes? I said before he's innocent until proven guilty of the disappearance (and that's all it is) of Madeline McCann.
Sadly you weren't saying that to those accusing the Mccans those including yourself i assume.
I'll ask again though
Based in what we know what is the most likley scenario as to what happened at that hotel
1. the parents killed her
2.the convicted child rapist that has been linked to 3 missing children as he was in the area and burgled hotel rooms and low and behold changed car ownership the day after the abduction and he told people he knows she's dead
sorry but I'm going with option 2
you?
Sadly you weren't saying that to those accusing the Mccans those including yourself i assume.
I'll ask again though
Based in what we know what is the most likley scenario as to what happened at that hotel
1. the parents killed her
2.the convicted child rapist that has been linked to 3 missing children as he was in the area and burgled hotel rooms and low and behold changed car ownership the day after the abduction and he told people he knows she's dead
sorry but I'm going with option 2
you?
I'm going with secret option no 3. It was an accident which the parents have covered up. Their actions may well have led to the death of their daughter in which case it's manslaughter.
You can stick with option 2 if you want Poirot.
Imagine that, taken 12 years for people to link him to this.
Thats okay, but what evidence do you have that the parents were not involved?
I'm going with secret option no 3. It was an accident which the parents have covered up. Their actions may well have led to the death of their daughter in which case it's manslaughter.
You can stick with option 2 if you want Poirot.

that's not how it works.. the burden of proof lies with the accuser.
the information we now was key
I doubt they stumbled across a rapist killer and got help in purpose
your choice is option 1 you vegetable
option one was
1. the parents killed her
I'm certainly poirot in comparison to you on the evidence of this mate
What proof do you have on this bloke being the one - the look in his eye?