Looks that way doesn’t it!
indeed they've got him... let's hope they find something. it sounds like the girl knows something
Looks that way doesn’t it!
Morning CC
![]()
You miss the point about innocent until proven guilty.
Using this German guy as an example he may have murdered and raped some other child and that’s why he is in prison. But if he did not commit an offence relating to Madeline and if he is convicted as an easy patsy in order to “close” the file we could be letting the real offender off, whoever that is, and he could go on to commit more and similar offences against other children.
We should always make sure as far as we can that the person convicted of any offence is the actual offender.
I'm not going around in circles mate.... I have my stance it's all on here .. you're entitled to yours I just can't be arsed saying the same things
I will stick with my stance, circumstantial evidence and probability appear to be used here to pin it on a bloke. I have done the same with her parents.
However it’s more plausible that a convicted rapist both adult and child is more likely the better suspect than the parents who are on the holidays.I will stick with my stance, circumstantial evidence and probability appear to be used here to pin it on a bloke. I have done the same with her parents.
However it’s more plausible that a convicted rapist both adult and child is more likely the better suspect than the parents who are on the holidays.
I still think there’s a connection between him and one of the family or friends. But I have not facts about this it’s just my own take on it. The way the parents acted after this suggest that they are in some way guilty aswell. I’m thinking a coverup!
However it’s more plausible that a convicted rapist both adult and child is more likely the better suspect than the parents who are on the holidays.
I still think there’s a connection between him and one of the family or friends. But I have not facts about this it’s just my own take on it. The way the parents acted after this suggest that they are in some way guilty aswell. I’m thinking a coverup!
Like I said yesterday in one reply, wouldn't surprise me if what they used to sedate her was from him.
well I have a feeling he was just a chancer and the more probable is the least far fetched, but we will hopefully get closer to the truth... it's a judgement call really I could be wrong but I'm confident
The point is they committed a crime and just because they suffered tragedy that shouldn't negate that.
The question is why did he only take Maddie then?
Could it be they accidentally administered a high dose of sedatives, because they wanted an adults night, went to check on her, realised they ****ed up, made a phone call to get rid of her and that's where he fits in.
The only question then is why was there blood in their car.
In the eyes of the law the crime they committed was very minor. It just had tragic consequences.
well I have a feeling he was just a chancer and the more probable is the least far fetched, but we will hopefully get closer to the truth... it's a judgement call really I could be wrong but I'm confident
Usually in high profile cases, they like to make an example of people. Either way, they should at least have their other kids taken off them.
Neglect definitely. Potential OD on prescribed drugs? Given their positions, this could result in them being struck off too.
Usually in high profile cases, they like to make an example of people. Either way, they should at least have their other kids taken off them.
Neglect definitely. Potential OD on prescribed drugs? Given their positions, this could result in them being struck off too.

Disagree. No need to punish their other kids because they've made one mistake. Charge them for sure, have it on their record. I'm pretty sure they've learned from it and won't make the same mistake.