1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Defoe and the Goons

Discussion in 'Tottenham Hotspur' started by PleaseNotPoll, Sep 25, 2011.

  1. PleaseNotPoll

    PleaseNotPoll Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    96,258
    Likes Received:
    55,737
    With Jermain Defoe missing the win against Wigan due to illness and the return to the first XI of both Sandro and van der Vaart, how would people like to see us approach the game against Arsenal on Sunday?

    Should we revert to a 4-4-2 and put Defoe back into the side or should we stick with the 4-5-1 that worked so well in the first half against Wigan, before an eye injury and some fitness issues appeared to slow us down?
     
    #1
  2. Patsbighands

    Patsbighands Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2011
    Messages:
    1,712
    Likes Received:
    60
    Think i would start with a 442 and see how things go.It's worked well so far,sure we would have started 442 yesterday if Defoe had been fit.
     
    #2
  3. I'd definitely go 442, with Defoe and Ade up front.
     
    #3
  4. NSIS

    NSIS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    36,067
    Likes Received:
    14,555
    Despite losing Fabregas and Nasri, they still carry a threat from midfield, with the players that remain. I suppose it remains a balance between how much Harry feels he needs to counter that threat, and how much success he feels Defoe would have against the goons shaky defence. Personally, I'd go with Defoe, I think he could cause trouble for Koscielny and Mertesacker - assuming he's fully fit, of course.
     
    #4
  5. PowerSpurs

    PowerSpurs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    13,080
    Likes Received:
    5,661
    I think our 10 best available outfield players started at Wigan. While I am normally in favour of rotation I can't see why we would play a weaker team against Arsenal. Having the best players on the pitch is more important than the formation.
    Leave Defoe on the bench and bring him on when we are 3 - 0 up
     
    #5
  6. robin_van_ fiberglass

    robin_van_ fiberglass Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    3,582
    Likes Received:
    4
    May as well play Adebayor given he is guaranteed to score against us.
     
    #6
  7. PleaseNotPoll

    PleaseNotPoll Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    96,258
    Likes Received:
    55,737
  8. No Kane No Gain

    No Kane No Gain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    20,582
    Likes Received:
    3,483
    I agree with keeping the team the same but I don't agree with that at all.

    Keep Defoe as an impact sub but I'd rather we didn't start off in an open 442 and have to keep coming back from behind against them, like we did last season because it's not always going to work.
     
    #8
  9. Ade to get a hat-trick <ok>
     
    #9
  10. No Kane No Gain

    No Kane No Gain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    20,582
    Likes Received:
    3,483
    We'd be better off with injured Dawson in goal than Gomes!
     
    #10

  11. PleaseNotPoll

    PleaseNotPoll Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    96,258
    Likes Received:
    55,737
    4 of those players did play when we beat you in the game that Rose scored in, SNIAW.
     
    #11
  12. notsosmartspur

    notsosmartspur Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    11,612
    Likes Received:
    59
    The Goons current CB's are slow, so Defoe should play. I'm not predicting a United score, but we're at home and should get at them ourselves and not worry about their MF...unless its taking over, which is highly unlikely!.
     
    #12
  13. PowerSpurs

    PowerSpurs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    13,080
    Likes Received:
    5,661
    Not much between us I think SF: If Defoe was as good as Adebayor (which would get him into my 'best' team ahead of Sandro or Parker) then we'd probably play 442 but it wouldn't be open as Arsenal would have to drop Song back to help their centre backs who wouldn't cope otherwise. And I didn't say the formation was unimportant, just less important than playing the best players . As I've said a few times I'd much prefer us to play a flexible 4231 as I think it suits our strengths which lie in support attackers (Bale, Modric, VdV, Lennon, Pienaar, Kranjcar) rather than out and out strikers, particularly now that we've got Adebayor who is well suited to this system whereas Pav or Defoe don't have the all round game to make it work.
     
    #13
  14. SpursDisciple

    SpursDisciple Booking: Mod abuse - overturned on appeal
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    30,118
    Likes Received:
    16,885
    4-2-2 is just showing off. Surely we would need 11 players?
     
    #14
  15. PowerSpurs

    PowerSpurs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    13,080
    Likes Received:
    5,661
    Well given Arsenal's current form we'd have a chance, but I've edited the post in any case......
     
    #15
  16. redwhiteandermblue

    redwhiteandermblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    6,647
    Likes Received:
    2,281
    I think 4-5-1 is just barely more likely to get the win, while 4-4-2 is much more likely to win by more. But I'd go for 4-5-1--mostly because I'm afraid not starting VDV now will cause problems later.
     
    #16
  17. Eton Trifle

    Eton Trifle Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2011
    Messages:
    62
    Likes Received:
    0
    For me, Defoe has to play against Mertesacker. He is so slow, ha s the turning circle of a cross channnel ferry and is still adjusting to the EPL.

    I understand this means VdV may not play in his stongest position and will most likely start wide right in Lennons absence but, I thinkl we go for it 442 style and use Ade on his with VdV i behind as plan B.
     
    #17

Share This Page