Glory pardon?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Eric Le Merde said:
Before anybody comes or goes why don't we make it clear what the rules of engagement are for the board and if people stick to them then ok, if not I would prefer a system where we had a "please explain request" from our mods, rather than a ban with no communication, and if the poster can't explain then a recommendation to ban and duration is sent to the supermods from our mods. When somebody is banned then our mods post a clear statement as to who is banned, why they are banned and how long it will last for.

There are some pretty clear rules to be found for the site anyway. Personally and based on the published site rules I have no reason to object to Glory returning. One of the key reasons given, at the time, for him to be banned was that he was running dual accounts, i.e., Me. That was and is not true and so this reason can be taken away from his list of "crimes" If however running dual accounts is against the rules then perhaps it could be added to our own particular forums rules. I personally can't see the point in having dual accounts, it seems a bit weird and odd. So I would 100% support a rule that banned those who did have dual accounts. The two usernames would then be published by our mods on our forum and we could all have a good laugh at the sickos.

Lets just get him back and move on, presumably the banning button would still work if the sh!t started flying again?
Click to expand...
Only trouble with this Eric is that what you say is pure common sense which seems to be lacking on this thread and some people seem to be hiding
All this talk of being to busy to make a decision I don’t believe
More like can’t be bothered
Seems to me that there is a lack of responsibility somewhere
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eireleeds1
Eireleeds1 said:
Why not put it to a non binding vote anyway if you’re convinced it’s such a minority. Result could help the super mods in their decision. Maybe some are afraid of what the results might throw up. Personally I’m curious. Simple three way vote. 1 ban remains 2 ban removed and 3 don’t care either way
Click to expand...
Why have a vote, this thread shows who is in favour of his ban being lifted, you can’t tell me this hasn’t been an orchestrated effort to drum up support.
 
Eireleeds1 said:
Exactly and it’s the ones that complain about snowflakes that do the most whining. People holding grudges for donkeys years given what’s going on is pathetic in my opinion
Click to expand...
And you get upset regarding certain comments, we all do. The difference is most posters don't come on here just to stir the ****, just for the sake of it. I personally never went running to the mods to get people banned, I also didn't say one thing to their face and then tell someone else something different. But I know a person who did
<ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: wakeybreakyheart, FORZA LEEDS and ristac
Irishshako said:
I apologise Ristac because I swore that I wouldn't get involved and that I'd said everything on the subject. :(
Click to expand...
No mate, I’m glad you and Forza have spoken out, I know a few more who haven’t. The question was asked, it’s been put to Brb to see how it works and he hasn’t answered.

The silence means he either doesn’t want to lift the ban or he has more pressing issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bucks_is_leeds, Irishshako and FORZA LEEDS
2 pennth said:
Only trouble with this Eric is that what you say is pure common sense which seems to be lacking on this thread and some people seem to be hiding
All this talk of being to busy to make a decision I don’t believe
More like can’t be bothered
Seems to me that there is a lack of responsibility somewhere
Click to expand...

A decision was made a couple of years ago - BANNED
 
  • Like
Reactions: Irishshako
2 pennth said:
Only trouble with this Eric is that what you say is pure common sense which seems to be lacking on this thread and some people seem to be hiding
All this talk of being to busy to make a decision I don’t believe
More like can’t be bothered
Seems to me that there is a lack of responsibility somewhere
Click to expand...
I think I will have to quote "yes Prime Minister" - but I can't find the quote, I'm sure you know the one I mean
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 pennth
Democracy at it very best. People who don’t comment or vote is fine. They have their reasons and fair enough but trying to put a slant on what way they’re thinking Is daft. Only comments that matter are the ones expressed and not what people think others are thinking. As for drumming up support, should we all shut up and say nothing
 
  • Like
Reactions: wakeybreakyheart, 2 pennth and Irishshako
ristac said:
Taken from the Glory Statement Thread When he was first banned confirming brb had already had enough of his antics


https://www.not606.com/threads/why-glory-owes-wj-an-apology.358188/ More problems and Minxy involved

https://www.not606.com/threads/super-mods-vote.313244/page-3#post-8465965 That post onwards referencing report button being used

I just grabbed those three out of the plentiful examples.
Click to expand...

Looks like brb put a great amount of time and effort in coming to the original decision.

Job done <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: ristac
Eireleeds1 said:
Democracy at it very best. People who don’t comment or vote is fine. They have their reasons and fair enough but trying to put a slant on what way they’re thinking Is daft. Only comments that matter are the ones expressed and not what people think others are thinking. As for drumming up support, should we all shut up and say nothing
Click to expand...
If the supermods/mods did decide to let the 606 posters put it to a vote. Who would be allowed to vote, only Leeds Utd posters or every Tom. Dick and TC. Also would it be a secret vote like the way people vote governments in or out. I appreciate that this is all hypothetical, but I just wanted to ask..<ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: wakeybreakyheart
Eireleeds1 said:
Democracy at it very best. People who don’t comment or vote is fine. They have their reasons and fair enough but trying to put a slant on what way they’re thinking Is daft. Only comments that matter are the ones expressed and not what people think others are thinking. As for drumming up support, should we all shut up and say nothing
Click to expand...
I agree but I don’t feel repeating the same stuff over and over again gets anyone anywhere.

I’ll tell you how it’s looking in my corner... It looks very much like a little WhatsApp or similar type group is running working out the next move ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Irishshako
Irishshako said:
If the supermods/mods did decide to let the 606 posters put it to a vote. Who would be allowed to vote, only Leeds Utd posters or every Tom. Dick and TC. Also would it be a secret vote like the way people vote governments in or out. I appreciate that this is all hypothetical, but I just wanted to ask..<ok>
Click to expand...
And we all know some people have 10 accounts ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: ellandback and Irishshako
ristac said:
I agree but I don’t feel repeating the same stuff over and over again gets anyone anywhere.

I’ll tell you how it’s looking in my corner... It looks very much like a little WhatsApp or similar type group is running working out the next move ;)
Click to expand...
Now I feel left out as I wasn’t asked to join the what’s app group. Maybe there’s two. One for and one against
 
  • Like
Reactions: davy, wakeybreakyheart and Irishshako
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back