They are a lot better at it than Ehab Allam. Surely you’ve spotted that by now.But Millwall manage it
Brentford manage it
Preston too
Plenty of other teams too
Why do people think it’s so hard or impossible for us to do it?
They are a lot better at it than Ehab Allam. Surely you’ve spotted that by now.But Millwall manage it
Brentford manage it
Preston too
Plenty of other teams too
Why do people think it’s so hard or impossible for us to do it?
Sometimes with justification. High justification in this case if you ask me. It almost seems our current manager is devoid of self esteem given his unrelenting defence/denial of his own personal performance. Blinded by the (spot) light.Every manager has been insulted and castigated by a percentage of participants on here since this forum came into existence.
But Millwall manage it
Brentford manage it
Preston too
Plenty of other teams too
Why do people think it’s so hard or impossible for us to do it?
And most on here have no financial skin in the game or any professional experience of it. So that's where we are.
Millwall sacked a club legend and got rowett in. Slutsky was left field and could have been a huge success. Only have to look at Nigel Pearson to see how it works at some clubs and not others.They are a lot better at it than Ehab Allam. Surely you’ve spotted that by now.
The owners will have significantly less financial skin in the game If the next 9 games are anything like the last 11.
Also anyone to say supporters have no skin in the game clearly doesn't pay for his own tickets and transport.
I think you and I are having a slight communication issue. Maybe it's me, maybe it's you, maybe both of us, but you're interpreting a lot of what I have written in a manner that is different from my intention.
When I wrote 'financial skin in the game', it was regarding a financial interest in the sport. Not spending money on it.
Owners are stakeholders, customers are too in any business, especially football because sales account for a greater proportion of club income the lower down the pyramid you fall.
OK, that's fine. I'll try again. By 'financial skin in the game', I meant a professional income/investment derived from it.
But it's not been taken out of the club it's been slowly repaying the massive £100 million debt we were in that was created in 2014 - at least the debt is manageable again - at one stage Hull City accounted for a significant proportion of Allams total net worth - I bet he was ****ting himself when Bruce got us relegated
GMc is earning an income from the business. A financial skin I think from your latest definition.OK, that's fine. I'll try again. By 'financial skin in the game', I meant a professional income/investment derived from it.
What do you think is derived from supporters investing in a membership?
GMc is earning an income from the business. A financial skin I think from your latest definition.
Insanity mate, which is right on with the Allam’s, probably why they appear to love McCann!I’m sure that’s the definition of “stupid” doing the same failing things and expecting different results
Insanity mate, which is right in with the Allam’s.
I think you're nit-picking over not so important points. My post we are discussing referred to the fact that most commenting on this thread don't have a financial income derived from the game. Most will spend some of their income on the game, but not be professionally invested in it, looking for a financial return.
The point is the relationship between football professionals and supporters is symbiotic. One is dependent on the other.
I don't know what you were trying to prove by trying to make a distinction, but without fans there is no club, and without financial contributions from fans there are no paid professionals.
Whether mccann turns it around or is replaced he'll get paid according to his current contract regardless and be free to take employment elsewhere.
So you're right, I don't see what point you were trying to make, but suggesting that the supporters who fund the professionals wages somehow shouldn't have an opinion is naive.
Is Heimdalr
- A bot
- W. U. M.
- Troll (not mythological)
- Norse / Viking
- Mythological Norse God
- Interesting chap with some good but left field observations
- New persona of Big Vern / EGD / that other one
- The future
- Bored
- Now
At no point have i suggested that supporters can't have opinions. I have written that the majority-held opinion on this matter is wrong, in my opinion, and tried to explain my reasoning why.