Match Day Thread West Ham v Saints, Saturday 29th Feb 2020, 3pm

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Ings and Redmond from the start, RB playing right back, and JWP in the middle and the game is more competitive. Just haven't got the depth.
Don't get the RB thing with Ralph. Clearly needed more fight in the midfield, and JWP would of provided that.

There's certainly no question that we'd have had a better chance with a full XI. But I'd still have favoured West Ham with their direct strategy. What we really wanted was Lanzini, Anderson, Wilshere etc trying to play pretty football. Antonio and Haller bullying us was as predicable as Rickie scoring a penalty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OddRiverOakWizards
We always moan when we aren’t given credit for a win. You have to give them their dues, they’ve played very well and done a job on us.

Difficult to congratulate the opposition when it feels like we just played into their hands again. If we play well and have some reasonable tactics against such a team and they still play well and win then fair enough.
Ralph doesn't know how to play against physical sides who like long balls and in an attempt to do so went with a weird ass team selection again.
It's a bad combination to have 66% of posession whilst also attempting to be setup to hit a team on the break.
Why do you have two RBs on the bench and none in the team? If neither are fit enough to play the 90, start one and have the other on the bench. And then if worst comes to worst you have JWP that can be moved there. Then you can play JWP in the middle where he will have more of an impact on the game.
But then if you insist on playing JWP at RB despite having two on the bench, why do you then play Smallbone in midfield who is lightweight and inexperienced. This was a very different proposition from a home game vs Villa. You ideally play JWP in his position and if not, Romeu comes in. We might have lost anyway, but at least don't hand it to them with janky lineup and tactics.

I love Ralph but he doesn't half make some weird decisions sometimes.
Also typical that the only person that I work with that is interested in football is a bloody West Ham fan and one that regularly refers to them as the greatest team in the world, and world cup winners :emoticon-0119-puke:
 
Difficult to congratulate the opposition when it feels like we just played into their hands again. If we play well and have some reasonable tactics against such a team and they still play well and win then fair enough.
Ralph doesn't know how to play against physical sides who like long balls and in an attempt to do so went with a weird ass team selection again.
It's a bad combination to have 66% of posession whilst also attempting to be setup to hit a team on the break.
Why do you have two RBs on the bench and none in the team? If neither are fit enough to play the 90, start one and have the other on the bench. And then if worst comes to worst you have JWP that can be moved there. Then you can play JWP in the middle where he will have more of an impact on the game.
But then if you insist on playing JWP at RB despite having two on the bench, why do you then play Smallbone in midfield who is lightweight and inexperienced. This was a very different proposition from a home game vs Villa. You ideally play JWP in his position and if not, Romeu comes in. We might have lost anyway, but at least don't hand it to them with janky lineup and tactics.

I love Ralph but he doesn't half make some weird decisions sometimes.
Also typical that the only person that I work with that is interested in football is a bloody West Ham fan and one that regularly refers to them as the greatest team in the world, and world cup winners :emoticon-0119-puke:
<applause><applause><applause>