H
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
You're a fantasist, they always get caught. We are doing the law abiding public a service by keeping you occupied on here.
Do the Truffle Shuffle mate come on we are bored.
Don’t pretend you ain’t been doin that **** for 30 years HIAG, ain’t nobody gonna believe that ****.
H
Hoddle is a god
Guest
I actually have sat on a murder trial btw. We found the person guilty, but it was by no means a clear cut case. So I was quite amused with your daft ideas. Today the main problem for police forces is nothing to do with DNA or whether you do this that and the other. The biggest problem facing all crime investigations is financing it. One case could wipe out an entire police budget. People have many misconceptions about dna, but one of the biggest problems with it is again cost. So it becomes a matter of what samples to send for testing and what ones not to. As for CCTV etc, it takes an enormous amount of man hours that the police force can ill afford, someone having to sit through hours of pointless footage to find a few seconds or minutes of detail. It gets to the stage you have to convict on what you know, but not necessarily based on the perfect evidence, but based on what the police force could afford.
You over think it too much bruv. A conviction can be based on do the Jury all agree you are guilty. They don't need a shred of evidence to come to that conclusion. As long has they can associate you in some way with the crime, your life hangs in the balance of 12 people. You ever heard of the Birmingham six?
