Match Day Thread General matchday thread.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
astro said:
Looking through a lot of media (not just this forum) it's weird how many people saying

"Wolves goal should of stood because the spirit of the offside rule is about gaining a significant advantage and he was only a little bit offside"

are also saying

"doesn't matter that City gained a significant advantage from the ref winning them the ball because technically the rule only says if the ball physically touches him"
Click to expand...
**** off back to the Liverpool board you plastic spanner.
 
Libby said:
Not read it all but seems to me that Fosse had a drink and started windmilling a bit after posters spent the entire weekend making sexually related posts about his teenage - and underage presumably - daughter.

From a quick look he certainly doesn't appear to have started it last night, being called a pervert before throwing insults out.
Click to expand...
Oh well it was fosses fault for saying he shagged my mum. :bandit:
 
astro said:
Looking through a lot of media (not just this forum) it's weird how many people saying

"Wolves goal should of stood because the spirit of the offside rule is about gaining a significant advantage and he was only a little bit offside"

are also saying

"doesn't matter that City gained a significant advantage from the ref winning them the ball because technically the rule only says if the ball physically touches him"
Click to expand...

Oh look. Vvd handles the ball and Liverpool get a goal. Standard Liverpool refereeing.

This Liverpool league win looks like it will have a lance Armstrong sizes asterix next to it
 
BobbyD said:
Oh look. Vvd handles the ball and Liverpool get a goal. Standard Liverpool refereeing.

This Liverpool league win looks like it will have a lance Armstrong sizes asterix next to it
Click to expand...
Ooooh i do love a big asterix
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bumps
astro said:
Looking through a lot of media (not just this forum) it's weird how many people saying

"Wolves goal should of stood because the spirit of the offside rule is about gaining a significant advantage and he was only a little bit offside"

are also saying

"doesn't matter that City gained a significant advantage from the ref winning them the ball because technically the rule only says if the ball physically touches him"
Click to expand...

What about this one mate? :)

You must log in or register to see images
 
Archers Road said:
Howabout, “Liverpool will deservedly win the League, half their supporters won’t be able to point to Anfield on a map, and VAR will still be ****”? That cover everything?
Click to expand...

Nope mate sorry.
Its just...
You must log in or register to see images
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archers Road
Libby said:
What about this one mate? :)

You must log in or register to see images
Click to expand...

Fake news from the ABL media.

Watch this video and try saying either the spirit or the technicality of the rules were broken.

You must log in or register to see media
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bumps
astro said:
Fake news from the ABL media.

Watch this video and try saying either the spirit or the technicality of the rules were broken.

You must log in or register to see media
Click to expand...

It his arm and that's all that matters. Any touch means the goal should automatically be disallowed.

I mean, it's a stupid ****ing rule but while it's in place then your goal shouldn't have stood either.

No harm in admitting you got a bit lucky mate, happens to all of us. We've probably had the most luck out of anyone so far.
 
astro said:
Fake news from the ABL media.

Watch this video and try saying either the spirit or the technicality of the rules were broken.

You must log in or register to see media
Click to expand...
I was gona try find that tweet but whats the point <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bumps
Libby said:
It his arm and that's all that matters. Any touch means the goal should automatically be disallowed.

I mean, it's a stupid ****ing rule but while it's in place then your goal shouldn't have stood either.

No harm in admitting you got a bit lucky mate, happens to all of us. We've probably had the most luck out of anyone so far.
Click to expand...

It didn't hit his arm though, evidenced by the fact there's no change in the ball's trajectory
 
Libby said:
It his arm and that's all that matters. Any touch means the goal should automatically be disallowed.

I mean, it's a stupid ****ing rule but while it's in place then your goal shouldn't have stood either.

No harm in admitting you got a bit lucky mate, happens to all of us. We've probably had the most luck out of anyone so far.
Click to expand...
Not taking the piss here but thats not handball is it? No chnage in the ball motion, no slight deflection, its just not handball for me.

Red glasses off btw
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bumps
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back