Gomez Vs Sterling
- Thread starter luvgonzo
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
No. On the grounds it incriminates someone elseOn the grounds it might incriminate you?
so it was Zanjinho after allNo. On the grounds it incriminates someone else
He lost his beans because he made a daft suggestion and I pointed out it was daft and why.Tobes disagreed , in his normal restrained way,with something Jenners posted . I got the impression Jenners got the hump as he thought as Tobes isn't a Red he shouldn't be allowed to insult LFC posters on their board .
I was restrained btw, the abuse came from him.
https://www.not606.com/threads/is-video-assistant-referee-working.375470/page-11#post-12997016
well searched sir and you're right you were restrained .
PS terrifying to see as far back as that we were already arguing about ****ing VAR
The possible dangers of it slowing the game down were easy to predict, which was one of the main reasons I was against it. That and the obvious subjectivity of so many decisions that won't be eliminated by repeated viewings.well searched sir and you're right you were restrained .
PS terrifying to see as far back as that we were already arguing about ****ing VAR
However, I did think that that would be the price paid for fewer incorrect decisions over seemingly straightforward incidents - got that bit wrong.
'Well searched' it was Jenners last postwell searched sir and you're right you were restrained .
PS terrifying to see as far back as that we were already arguing about ****ing VAR
oops that bit passed me right by'Well searched' it was Jenners last post
I'll get me coat
'Sterling clash: Liverpool fans could have caused reaction - Danny Rose'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/50404849
What a crock of bullshit.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/50404849
What a crock of bullshit.
Obviously it's all our fault, of course.'Sterling clash: Liverpool fans could have caused reaction - Danny Rose'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/50404849
What a crock of bullshit.
And none of our players ever get **** from fans of their previous clubs.
Do they, @Libby ?
I just read that. So four years and 8 or 9 games (getting dog's abuse) later, it's the Liverpool fans fault.'Sterling clash: Liverpool fans could have caused reaction - Danny Rose'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/50404849
What a crock of bullshit.
I just read that. So four years and 8 or 9 games later, it's the Liverpool fans fault.
Reading the article Rose never said what the BBC are quoting.
Are we surprisedReading the article Rose never said what the BBC are quoting.
well searched sir and you're right you were restrained .
PS terrifying to see as far back as that we were already arguing about ****ing VAR
There's a Saints fan there talking some real sense about how it wouldn't bring consistency - smart bloke
Obviously it's all our fault, of course.
And none of our players ever get **** from fans of their previous clubs.
Do they, @Libby ?
How weird that you posted that just as I was reading this thread
Safe to say it's all your fault tbh
So Siva found guilty by the FA of breaking the same rule as Suarez, Sterling backed him from minute one to the disgust of Kick it Out, two large eggs on his grid in two days.
'Bernardo Silva: Manchester City forward banned and fine for Benjamin Mendy message'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/50404855
'Bernardo Silva: Manchester City forward banned and fine for Benjamin Mendy message'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/50404855
Suarez - 8 game ban with no evidence
Silva - 1 game ban with 100% evidence, delayed until after he played us
[HASHTAG]#seemslegit[/HASHTAG]