Serious takeover talk

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Kittenmittons said:
So am I. So I want to know what happens to it in future. This thread is called serious takeover talk.

I still think the investment is a good thing, but Smug told us last week it was definitely still a takeover not just a loan. Would like to see that happen and want to know more. Is that ok with you, officer?
Click to expand...
Why do you need to know more? So you can pick holes in it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: janey, Skanter, Linus and 3 others
I suggested a while back that there would be no fanfare. I think it’s the right way to go. At the end of the day what they have invested isn’t really worthy of a fanfare.
Why advertise wealth ?
What is worthy of a fanfare is the fact that they are on board. I think it’s a small step towards a takeover. Let’s hope we get under their skin.
Ive just re read this. It is a small step but it’s also a massive step, if you know what I mean.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nacho, Peterleeyacker and Linus
Smug in Boots said:
No he certainly didn't ...

... and, in any case, building an argument based on a post from a stranger would be very silly imo.

I certainly wouldn't dream of doing it.
Click to expand...
Smug in Boots said:
You seem to have a balanced view on all of this mate ...

... as far as I'm concerned it's a takeover.

If it was simply an investment of funds they would have much less influence.

As it happens Donald, and Methven, have helped present us with a huge opportunity.

I take my hat off to them and choose to ignore the claims that Short is the driving force.
Click to expand...

Basing it on this, smug
 
wtdog said:
Why do you need to know more? So you can pick holes in it.
Click to expand...

No. I want to know what kind of things might lead to them having a bigger say and us getting more money. How are people here so hostile to the most basic questions here? All I'm asking is to know what kight trigger the conversion.
 
Kittenmittons said:
No. I want to know what kind of things might lead to them having a bigger say and us getting more money. How are people here so hostile to the most basic questions here? All I'm asking is to know what kight trigger the conversion.
Click to expand...
Why? what difference does it Make to you? At the match yesterday I spoke to loads of people, not one mentioned it.
 
You also said we'd be pleasantly surprised when the details came out. All I'm saying is it'd be lovely to get some of those details and be pleasantly surprised, rather than right now being cautiously optimistic that there's better people involved in some way.

As you said, they don't deal in loans, and you couldn't see it being a loan as that would mean they lacked influence.
 
wtdog said:
He won't have a positive word to say about it and actually mean it. He'll pay lip service to being pleased but gagging to find fault or try to prove someone us lying, usually based on semantics.
SD can be traced back to the height if summer talking about "investment" and him remaining. It's happened.
Click to expand...

I said I am happy, but when we've been told by someone so ITK as smug that it's a takeover, and that we'll be pleasantly surprised by the details, then yeah, I'm hoping for that, not what (without detail) is a loan which gives them no say in the club's running at this point.
 
Kittenmittons said:
I said I am happy, but when we've been told by someone so ITK as smug that it's a takeover, and that we'll be pleasantly surprised by the details, then yeah, I'm hoping for that, not what (without detail) is a loan which gives them no say in the club's running at this point.
Click to expand...
I dont believe you are happy. You will continue to try and pick holes. I believe documentation comes out this week? You'll be all over it like horse ****e and twisting to suit your agenda.
You also asked me about freedom of speech...can you really practise it using a nom de plume?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dred and janey
Kittenmittons said:
You also said we'd be pleasantly surprised when the details came out. All I'm saying is it'd be lovely to get some of those details and be pleasantly surprised, rather than right now being cautiously optimistic that there's better people involved in some way.

As you said, they don't deal in loans, and you couldn't see it being a loan as that would mean they lacked influence.
Click to expand...

As I've just said, you won't ...

... the end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Whittylad
Smug in Boots said:
I have my opinion but I'm just a stranger on a chat forum who might well be making everything up.

If you told your partner you were risking your house on that opinion they'd be quite right to kick you into touch.
Click to expand...

But I'm not. I'm just asking for more details, and people are jumping on my back. I want it to be a takeover. Is that wrong?
 
wtdog said:
I dont believe you are happy. You will continue to try and pick holes. I believe documentation comes out this week? You'll be all over it like horse ****e and twisting to suit your agenda.
You also asked me about freedom of speech...can you really practise it using a nom de plume?
Click to expand...

Yes. You can indeed.

And this is the serious takeover chat thread. If you don't want to discuss details, maybe this thread isn't for you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back