So far maestro, its only you and (quite surprised at this) WLOH.
My main gripe is that all of you were very quick to blame the ref for your defeats.
That is not strictly true. Maybe some were but that may have also been down to the way they wrote what they were saying.
No one blamed the ref for the Chelsea defeat but some people were not happy about some of the decisions which largely went Chelsea's way 'in some people's opinion'.
No one blamed the ref for the WBA defeat, we all agreed it was a poor performance buy City, however the referee did make some bad calls 'in some people's opinion'.
The 2 draws we had also had controversial decisions 'in some people's opinion'.
Now, unless you allow people to have their opinion then there is no point in being here and it is not a case of the one who can beat his chest loudest is right!
Lets go back to some other controversial decisions in the past to re-enforce what Maestro has said, and what I have tried to say.
Guru has highlighted us a whinging fans because of decisions made this season.
Last season in 'in some people's opinion' Grant Holt got a decision in his favour, so consequently not in the favour of Ipswich and some Town fans still remind us of this.
Some years ago Cunago, with 2 minutes to go at Portman Road, when City were a goal up 'dived' to get a penalty and a draw was the result at the final whistle. Did you moan at that time Guru? I doubt it and I am sure you would still argue it was a foul/penalty, many would disagree. Opinions once again.