Wasn't much in it whether it went forward. But maybe it did a bit.
It definitely did...a bitI think it's more fundamental than that Smokey. The punter who makes the effort and actually goes to the matches thus providing the atmosphere is written out of the action whilst some bellends in a studio entertain the armchair viewer with their deliberations. It's completely ****ed up thinking made even worse because it hasn't made the decision making any better.It seems to me that the main issue with VAR is that it's too subjective, there doesn't seem to be a clear set of rules that they're supposed to be following. Someone's idea of a foul or handball is different to someone else's so the rules need to be clear for what is an offence. So the video replay when looked at should have a clear guideline to follow. If used right it could benefit the game.
Why has no referee in the EPL used the pitch side monitor at the same time as the central review is taking place? Has this been a directive from 'referee' central?
Maybe it would just waste more time.
Apparently the EPL are doing it differently (why would you want to fall in line with everyone else especially when some of your teams play in other competitions which use that approach - that's just plain sillyWhy has no referee in the EPL used the pitch side monitor at the same time as the central review is taking place? Has this been a directive from 'referee' central?
). Apparently Mike Riley ( English Ref Chief) doesn't want to slow the game down further by having the ref legging it off the pitch.