Match Day Thread General matchday thread.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
brb said:
Sorry mate, I've forgotten, can you just remind us all how much your team spent on a new football stadium? <whistle>
Click to expand...

City were a turgid team that got bought and spend their way to trophies.

We were
Libby said:
I think brb's point is that everyone slates City but most PL clubs are part of the problem.

We're paying a 3rd choice keeper 80 bags a week ffs!
Click to expand...

I get your point tbh but at the same time spurs are given dogs abuse for paying "too little" in wages by pundits and fans alike.

As for city, very few slate them. They are lauded for winning everything snd plsying good football and the obscene amount they spend is glossed over as are their regulsr rule breaking measures.

City were utter dross until they were taken over. They did not build anything...they simply bought it all.

United built their success over s period of time. Arsenal did the same. Liverpool too. Chelsea were winning trophies before they were bought.
City scored 9 goals at home the season before the take over. They had been relegated 3 times and over night were challenging for the top 6 and within 2 years were chsllenging for the top 4.

City pushed up transfer fees and wages across the board and despite spending over £700m in 3 years they sctuslly hsd the nerve to moan that they "could not sfford Maguire."
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
remembercolinlee said:
City were a turgid team that got bought and spend their way to trophies.

We were


I get your point tbh but at the same time spurs are given dogs abuse for paying "too little" in wages by pundits and fans alike.

As for city, very few slate them. They are lauded for winning everything snd plsying good football and the obscene amount they spend is glossed over as are their regulsr rule breaking measures.

City were utter dross until they were taken over. They did not build anything...they simply bought it all.

United built their success over s period of time. Arsenal did the same. Liverpool too. Chelsea were winning trophies before they were bought.
City scored 9 goals at home the season before the take over. They had been relegated 3 times and over night were challenging for the top 6 and within 2 years were chsllenging for the top 4.

City pushed up transfer fees and wages across the board and despite spending over £700m in 3 years they sctuslly hsd the nerve to moan that they "could not sfford Maguire."
Click to expand...

Sorry but I read a lot of words, but no mention of the answer to the question....how much was the new ground again? <whistle>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back