Steve Evans will be good fit .... who is going to notice one more mouthy ****?
Is he joining this forum?
Steve Evans will be good fit .... who is going to notice one more mouthy ****?
Steve Evans will be good fit .... who is going to notice one more mouthy ****?
Fook off you decrepit old kunt, go and have another fizz like yer did last night, I'm sure @Stan will know how to make you start blowing bubbles.
We'll be lining up fat kunt Evans to come and take over at your piss poor lot. Time our lot have finished with him, be amazed if he is still here in October.

You did notice who pipped them to 3rd place that season?4th worst supporters in the country. They've made a big effort this season to claim the top spot. Scummy ****ers.
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www....rst-behaved-in-british-football-1-8707803/amp
You did notice who pipped them to 3rd place that season?

FAILYou did notice who pipped them to 3rd place that season?

I assume Newcastle's are more serious? It says 4th year in a row Newcastle have the most banning orders?You did notice who pipped them to 3rd place that season?

Did you read this through again Saffy? We have cleaned our act up. These were banning orders carried over from previous seasons. We actually had the biggest decrease in banning orders meaning a lot expired and not many new ones.I assume Newcastle's are more serious? It says 4th year in a row Newcastle have the most banning orders?
https://assets.publishing.service.g...ated-arrests-banning-orders-1718-hosb2818.pdf
Wow. It was just a genuine question querying the difference between arrests and banning orders, not a dig or a wind up. I didn't mean to send you off on one.
Did you read this through again Saffy? We have cleaned our act up. These were banning orders carried over from previous seasons. We actually had the biggest decrease in banning orders meaning a lot expired and not many new ones.
The two teams with the largest number of new banning orders in the 2017-18 season.
- Sunderland and Grimsby with 28. Sunderland also had the largest increase in new banning orders during the season.
Now of course it may be that these were not the result of violent behaviour but just supporters who couldn't bear to watch the ****e your team were serving up as they plummeted through the leagues, and actually requested them to save them from further torture.
Anyway in the words of the great DMD - why do you keep doing this to yourself?
The way you could have interpreted these statistics in your favour was that the only reason our behaviour had seemingly improved was that we no longer had the Derby matches, our defeats in which were probably the result of our previous years banning league wins and considerable fear among the local police horse community.
So when you lose on the weekend at least you can console yourselves with the thought that you are making the Northeast a safer place to watch football.
Sorry. My excuse is its Ramadan - you must have seen what its done to Spurlock lately.Wow. It was just a genuine question querying the difference between arrests and banning orders, not a dig or a wind up. I didn't mean to send you off on one.
@Spurlock what's been happening on the Liverpool board it's like a **** off on there?
He's got his knickers in a twist thinking we're all cocky and entitled or some ****.@Spurlock what's been happening on the Liverpool board it's like a **** off on there?
Nah its fine. I now know that the banning orders carry over. I never thought of that, I just assumed they counted ones that had happened that season which is why I couldn't get my head around the difference.Sorry. My excuse is its Ramadan - you must have seen what its done to Spurlock lately.
Not sure...I popped in earlier because I wanted to remind a few Kopites about humility
Then they all twisted the **** on me
I made a mental note then left