You missed out "tedious" from that sentence
Match Day Thread Tottenham Hotspur v Ajax
- Thread starter PleaseNotPoll
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
You missed out "tedious" from that sentence
No...you have said
A) we are a better team without kane...you were saying that BEFORE we had knocked out Dortmund in the last 16.
B) That kane was the reason that we weren't winning when we lost to Burnley, Southampton, Chelsea and Liverpool.
C) that we scored more without Kane while ignoring
City 1 spurs 0
Spurs 1 Brighton 0
Spurs 0 West Ham 1
Spurs 0 Ajax 1
Bournemouth 1 spurs 0
1 goal in 5 games shows kane playing is the problem
D) we should sell kane.
Tbh you are a either a sad arsed gooner wum or a complete moron.
You constantly post crass rubbish...and that included you telling a member that you had more likes than them
.You put people who disagree with you on ignore, lie through your teeth about what you have ssid and try to plsy some kind of victim.
Its tedious ... you are tedious ... and that's why we all know you are a gooner wum
In summary, you know you are a plank-ton when even rcl cannot stomach you
(and he works in pee-sock Central) .
(and he works in pee-sock Central) .
No...you have said
A) we are a better team without kane...you were saying that BEFORE we had knocked out Dortmund in the last 16.
B) That kane was the reason that we weren't winning when we lost to Burnley, Southampton, Chelsea and Liverpool.
C) that we scored more without Kane while ignoring
City 1 spurs 0
Spurs 1 Brighton 0
Spurs 0 West Ham 1
Spurs 0 Ajax 1
Bournemouth 1 spurs 0
1 goal in 5 games shows kane playing is the problem
D) we should sell kane.
Tbh you are a either a sad arsed gooner wum or a complete moron.
You constantly post crass rubbish...and that included you telling a member that you had more likes than them
You put people who disagree with you on ignore, lie through your teeth about what you have ssid and try to plsy some kind of victim.
Its tedious ... you are tedious ... and that's why we all know you are a gooner wum
As my boy, Ben Askren would say:
Boom. Roasted.
Likes received by DGC: 616You constantly post crass rubbish...and that included you telling a member that you had more likes than them
Likes received by me: 11,124
This clearly means my opinion is almost twenty times more correct than his...which isn't a surprise, given it's supported by facts
Sorry to have to add a few facts - We have lost 50% of the matches with City and Ajax, playing well for about half of the total playing time in the 4 matches. That being the first half of the Home leg with city, played better in 2nd half of the 1st leg V Ajax than we had in the first, and I thought we were playing Ok in the first half on Wed and then superbly in the 2nd. We were battered at the Etihad, yes we scored 3 goals, but City were very open that night going for the win from the off and if we are being honest, we were saved by a couple of VAR decisions that could have gone either way.
I should also point out again that the team that saw off City included Kane, and the time that he spent on the pitch in the first leg coincided with the only time in the tie that we were in the ascendancy.
How are we supposed to address you? Thanks for that Brian gets called Brian all the time when it's clearly not his name. We could use the initials convention but you don't want to be called BO I presume?
Others might think I am right too but are just too scared to say so.And I respect your views. In some way, I believe you are right too
Oh, and my name isn't Barney!
Apologies if already posted.
You must log in or register to see media
You must log in or register to see images
Scared? Why would anyone be scared to offer a footie opinion. I respect your right to your opinion but on Harry Kane I think you are very wrong.
Ok. Your username isn't saying your name is Brian. You do always look on the bright side of life to be fair
Or they think that saying we should sell Harry Kane the second the whistle is blown after winning a Champions League semi final makes you look like the Spurs equivalent of a flat earther posting photos of their back garden on Twitter and asking "Where's the curve?" during a solar eclipse
Cretin
Blessed are the cheese makers.
What has Harry Kane ever done for us!
Back to line ups ( even if it is 3 weeks away ), I do agree with the above personnel but I would match up and play 433
Kane started outdoor work this week, which suggests there's chance he'll only be back in full training in 2 weeks' time. We have seen time and again how ponderous and clumsy he is when he gets back from injury, and in a game of this magnitude I'd be nervous making him our attacking focal point if he's going to be doing his impression of a man running through treacle, kicking a bollard.
I'd be much happier using him in the '3' behind one of Son or Lucas as the ST. That way he isn't being asked to chase long balls or engage in physical battles with their excellent CBs. After Eriksen he is our best passer of the ball and I think starting him in a deeper position and having him operate between the lines will confuse their CBs and CMs and disrupt their fluency to build attacks. That or start him on the bench. Hypothetical scenario but if you're Liverpool and you're 1-0 up with 20 mins to go the absolute last thing you want to see is Harry Kane coming on.
Hugo
Anyone Toby Jan Rose
Goat Alli*
Lucas Kane Eriksen
Son
Subs: Gazza, Dave, Davies, Winks, Dier, Lamela, Llorente
*(he has played here twice against Pool and did a remarkably good job of it. Plus Winks won't be fully fit after surgery and Dier & Wanyama just aren't good or reliable enough)